Passim

Mandamus decisions / Southern District of Florida

Carrasco Parra v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Southern District of FloridaRodolfo Armando Ruiz IIDecided November 29, 2025No. 1:25-cv-24652

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
USCIS adjudicated Plaintiff’s Form I-290B and issued its decision on October 24, 2025.
Form or filing I-290B Read by a model
USCIS adjudicated Plaintiff’s Form I-290B and issued its decision on October 24, 2025.
What the suit asked for Some other action Read by a model
Plaintiff subsequently filed an Amended Complaint on October 22, 2025, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to require USCIS and Defendants to adjudicate Plaintiff’s Form I-290B, Motion to Reconsider.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Read by a model
A. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss ANALYSIS Attacks on subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) come in two forms:
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”), [ECF No. 30], filed on November 13, 2025.
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is now moot, and dismissal is thus warranted for lack of jurisdiction.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is now moot, and dismissal is thus warranted for lack of jurisdiction.
The delay claim Moot: the agency acted Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is now moot, and dismissal is thus warranted for lack of jurisdiction.
The other claims Dismissed Read by a model
Plaintiff’s Supplemental Pleading, [ECF No. 39], is STRICKEN.
Months pending Not stated at filing The agency acted before this decision, so the months up to the decision are not a delay and are not shown. Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings Held moot Read by a model
As such, this case no longer presents a “live controversy” and dismissal for mootness is required.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:25-cv-24652
Filed
October 8, 2025
Ended
November 29, 2025
Suit's filing to its end
52 days
How it ended
Ended once the agency acted
From the record
idb disp 3 (dismissed: lack of jurisdiction)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.