Passim

Mandamus decisions / Middle District of Tennessee

Haji v. Noem

Middle District of TennesseeEli J. RichardsonDecided April 13, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00209

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,917 written decisions from 2,664 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 7:07 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
This matter is remanded to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) for adjudication, with USCIS to schedule Plaintiff for his naturalization ceremony within thirty (30) days of this order;
Form or filing N-400 (naturalization) Read by a model
Plaintiff’s naturalization application
What the suit asked for Naturalization hearing or remand (1447(b)) Read by a model
This matter is remanded to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) for adjudication, with USCIS to schedule Plaintiff for his naturalization ceremony within thirty (30) days of this order;
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
Pursuant to Defendants’ Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 12), the Court hereby ORDERS that:
Motion decided Remand under 1447(b) Read by a model
Pursuant to Defendants’ Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 12), the Court hereby ORDERS that:
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
Defendants’ Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 12)
Disposition Remanded to the agency Sent back to the agency, with or without instructions. Read by a model
This matter is remanded to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) for adjudication
Prevailing party Applicant Read by a model
USCIS will complete adjudication of the Plaintiff’s application within sixty (60) days of this order;
The delay claim Remanded to the agency Read by a model
This matter is remanded to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Months pending Not stated A section 1447(b) suit: these months run from the naturalization application. The statute's 120 days run from the interview, which they do not measure. Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

Docket
No. 3:26-cv-00209
Filed
February 25, 2026
Ended
April 13, 2026
Suit's filing to its end
47 days
How it ended
Remanded to the agency
From the record
idb disp 11 (remanded to U.S. agency)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Sixth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.