Passim

Mandamus decisions / Middle District of Pennsylvania

Grushko v. Wertman et al

Middle District of PennsylvaniaJennifer P. WilsonDecided June 8, 2026

Read the decisionOriginal on GovInfo

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Not recorded Read by a model
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Some other action Read by a model
Plaintiff is seeking a writ of mandamus directing his immediate transfer from FCI-Allenwood to prerelease custody under 18 U.S.C. § 3632.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
Therefore, the court will deny the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction at this time. The denial is without prejudice.
Motion decided Preliminary injunction or TRO Read by a model
Therefore, the court will deny the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction at this time.
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
Plaintiff seeks a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction setting an expedited hearing on the issue and directing the BOP to transfer him to RRC.
Disposition Denied in the government's favor The principal motion was denied in full: relief the plaintiff asked for denied on the merits, such as summary judgment, an injunction or fees. The government's motion denied so the case goes on is listed apart. Read by a model
Therefore, the court will deny the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction at this time.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
Therefore, the court will deny the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction at this time.
The other claims Relief denied Read by a model
Therefore, the court will deny the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction at this time. The denial is without prejudice.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Third Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.