Mandamus decisions / Middle District of Florida
Rodriguez-Francisco v. Field Office Director
Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener
2,917 written decisions from 2,664 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 7:07 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
USCIS
Read by a model
seeking an order compelling Defendants Field Director U.S. Cirizenship and Immigration Services and Secretary Markwayne Mullin to adjudicate his application for lawful permanent residence, which he filed in December 2024. |
|---|---|
| Form or filing |
I-485 (adjustment of status)
Read by a model
his application for lawful permanent residence |
| What the suit asked for |
Decide the application
Read by a model
to adjudicate his application for lawful permanent residence |
| Kind of order |
A ruling on a motion or the petition
Read by a model
Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 9) is DENIED. |
| Motion decided |
Preliminary injunction or TRO
Read by a model
Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 9) is DENIED. |
| Whose motion |
The plaintiff's motion
Read by a model
Before the Court is Plaintiff Misdael Rodriguez-Francisco’s Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. |
| Disposition |
Denied in the government's favor
The principal motion was denied in full: a motion to dismiss denied so the case goes on, or relief denied on the merits.
Read by a model
Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 9) is DENIED. |
| Prevailing party |
Government
Read by a model
Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 9) is DENIED. |
| The delay claim |
Not decided here
Read by a model
enjoining his removal from the United States while this action is pending. |
| The other claims |
Relief denied
Read by a model
Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 9) is DENIED. |
| Months pending |
20.3 months from the application to the court's decision
Read by a model
his application for lawful permanent residence, which he filed in December 2024. |
| TRAC factors | The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model |
| Threshold rulings | None Read by a model |
How the case ended
- Docket
- No. 2:26-cv-02397
- Filed
- August 20, 2026
- Ended
- September 30, 2026
- Suit's filing to its end
- 41 days
- How it ended
- Ended once the agency acted
- From the record
- voluntary dismissal 2026-09-30
A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.
Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance
-
Kanapuram v. Director, USCIS, 131 F.4th 1302
Eleventh Circuit, March 20, 2025. Section 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) strips district courts of jurisdiction over APA unreasonable-delay claims about pending adjustment applications where the delay is part of the discretionary adjudication process, including retrogression holds.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance. ImmCite has read all 2 published decisions citing this case, as of 2026-11-02; none treats it adversely. That describes those decisions; it is not a determination that the case is good law.