Passim

Mandamus decisions / Southern District of Florida

Dubinin v. Papazian

Southern District of FloridaRodolfo Armando Ruiz IIDecided November 21, 2025No. 1:25-cv-23877

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Not recorded Read by a model
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A sanctions order Read by a model
ORDER STRIKING COMPLAINT, ENTERING SANCTIONS, AND REFERRING COUNSEL TO THE FLORIDA BAR AND GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The court on its own Read by a model
Accordingly, the Court entered an Order to Show Cause listing at least ten instances where Plaintiff’s Response cited to non-existent cases and quotes.
Disposition Sanctions order An order on sanctions or attorney discipline. It decides no claim, so it is not counted as either side's win. Read by a model
ORDER STRIKING COMPLAINT, ENTERING SANCTIONS, AND REFERRING COUNSEL TO THE FLORIDA BAR AND GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
ORDER STRIKING COMPLAINT, ENTERING SANCTIONS, AND REFERRING COUNSEL TO THE FLORIDA BAR AND GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE
The delay claim Dismissed Read by a model
This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:25-cv-23877
Filed
August 28, 2025
Ended
August 29, 2025
Suit's filing to its end
1 days
How it ended
Ended, outcome not recorded
From the record
idb disp 18 (statistical closing)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.