Mandamus decisions / Northern District of California

Ehsanibenafati v. Rubio

Northern District of CaliforniaNathanael M. CousinsDecided October 16, 2025No. 5:25-cv-04054

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Department of State Read by rule
mandatory duty, whether the doctrine of consular nonreviewability applies, and whether a nearly nine-month delay by Defendants is unreasonable. For the reasons below, the Court DENIES
Form or filing 221(g) (consular refusal); DS-260 (immigrant visa) Read by rule
applications pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 221(g) because they failed to demonstrate their eligibility for the visas and additional screening was necessary. ECF 13 at 5 (citing ECF 13-1
Motion decided Summary judgment Read by rule
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

How the case ended

Docket
No. 5:25-cv-04054
Filed
May 9, 2025
Ended
October 16, 2025
Suit's filing to its end
160 days
How it ended
Dismissed on jurisdiction or the merits
From the record
idb disp 6 (judgment: motion before trial), judgment for defendant

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.