Mandamus decisions / Middle District of Pennsylvania
Alex Agyemang v. Warden of Clinton County Correctional Facility
Read the decisionOriginal on GovInfo
2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
ICE
Read by a model
Following his criminal sentence, ICE transferred Agyemang to immigration detention on March 4, 2025. |
|---|---|
| Form or filing | None named Read by a model |
| What the suit asked for | Not recorded Read by a model |
| Kind of order |
A ruling on a motion or the petition
Read by a model
Agyemang’s requests to reinstate the Court’s April 30, 2026 order (Doc. 17) releasing him from custody are GRANTED. |
| Motion decided |
Preliminary injunction or TRO
Read by a model
Petitioner Alex Agyemang’s (“Agyemang”) emergency motion for temporary restraining order to preserve status quo pending protection screening (Doc. 23) |
| Whose motion |
The plaintiff's motion
Read by a model
Before the Court are Petitioner Alex Agyemang’s (“Agyemang”) emergency motion for temporary restraining order to preserve status quo pending protection screening (Doc. 23); |
| Disposition | Dismissed in part; some claims go on The government's motion to dismiss was granted in part: some claims were dismissed and others go on. Read by a model |
| Prevailing party | Each side in part Read by a model |
| The other claims |
Some dismissed, some go on
Read by a model
Agyemang’s requests for stay of removal to Sierra Leone are DENIED for lack of jurisdiction. Agyemang’s requests to reinstate the Court’s April 30, 2026 order (Doc. 17) releasing him from custody are GRANTED. |
| Months pending | Not stated Read by a model |
| TRAC factors | The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model |
| Threshold rulings | None Read by a model |
| Nationality |
Ghana
Read by a model
Agyemang is a citizen of Ghana |
How the case ended
- Docket
- No. 3:26-cv-00688
- Filed
- March 17, 2026
- Ended
- April 30, 2026
- Suit's filing to its end
- 44 days
- How it ended
- Judgment for the plaintiff
- From the record
- idb disp 17 (judgment: other), judgment for plaintiff
A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why.
Supreme Court and Third Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance
-
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union v. OSHA, 145 F.3d 120
Third Circuit, March 16, 1998. The Third Circuit weighs the TRAC factors in deciding whether to compel agency action that has been unreasonably delayed.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance. ImmCite has read the one published decision citing this case, as of 2026-11-03; it does not treat the case adversely. That describes that decision; it is not a determination that the case is good law.
-
Geda v. Director, USCIS, 126 F.4th 835
Third Circuit, January 23, 2025. Section 1255(a) commits both the adjustment decision and the process and pace for reaching it to the Secretary's discretion, so § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) strips district courts of jurisdiction over challenges to USCIS's adjudication hold policy and § 1252(a)(2)(D) does not restore it.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance