Mandamus decisions / District of New Jersey

Bektas v. Isaacson

District of New JerseyStanley R. CheslerDecided February 5, 2026No. 2:25-cv-14746

Read the decisionOriginal on GovInfo

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Not recorded Read by a model
Form or filing I-589 (asylum) Read by a model
his affirmative asylum application.
What the suit asked for Decide the asylum application Read by a model
based on alleged unreasonable delay in the adjudication of his affirmative asylum application.
Kind of order A procedural order Read by a model
Where service is insufficient, default judgment must be denied regardless of any failure to respond.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
a Motion for Default Judgment submitted by Plaintiff Zulpykhar Bektas
Disposition Procedural order A scheduling, briefing, stay, show-cause or other procedural order. Not counted as either side's win. Read by a model
Where service is insufficient, default judgment must be denied regardless of any failure to respond.
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
Where service is insufficient, default judgment must be denied regardless of any failure to respond.
The delay claim Not decided here Read by a model
the Court declines to reach the merits of Plaintiff’s claims at this stage.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

Other orders in this case

The group holds 2 decisions from this suit, oldest first. Outcome counts on these pages count the case once, by its latest decision. How decisions are grouped into cases.

DecisionDecidedJudgeDisposition
Bektas v. IsaacsonThis decision February 5, 2026 Stanley R. Chesler Procedural order
BEKTAS v. ISAACSONThe case's latest decision: its outcome is the one counted June 18, 2026 Stanley R. Chesler Granted in the applicant's favor

How the case ended

Docket
No. 2:25-cv-14746
Filed
August 19, 2025
Status
Pending as of the last docket check

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Third Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.