Passim

Mandamus decisions / District of Arizona

Buniatyan v. Blanche

District of ArizonaKrissa M LanhamDecided June 24, 2026No. 2:26-cv-02842

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,917 written decisions from 2,664 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 7:07 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Not recorded Read by a model
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Some other action Read by a model
“to refer, schedule, and provide Petitioner with a constitutionally compliant credible fear screening including the presence of counsel and, if necessary, the review of any subsequent negative determination before an Immigration Judge.”
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
IT IS ORDERED the Motions to Stay Removal (Docs. 2, 8, 9) are DENIED.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
Petitioner also filed an emergency motion to stay his removal pending adjudication of his petition for writ of mandamus.
Disposition Denied in the government's favor The principal motion was denied in full: a motion to dismiss denied so the case goes on, or relief denied on the merits. Read by a model
IT IS ORDERED the Motions to Stay Removal (Docs. 2, 8, 9) are DENIED.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
IT IS ORDERED the Motions to Stay Removal (Docs. 2, 8, 9) are DENIED.
The other claims Relief denied Read by a model
IT IS ORDERED the Motions to Stay Removal (Docs. 2, 8, 9) are DENIED.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

Docket
No. 2:26-cv-02842
Filed
April 23, 2026
Status
Pending as of the last docket check

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.