Passim

Mandamus decisions / Southern District of New York

Munshi v. Bondi

Southern District of New YorkAnalisa Nadine TorresDecided July 13, 2026

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Not recorded Read by a model
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
seeking a writ of mandamus pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act and alleging that Defendants failed to adjudicate his immigration petition within a reasonable timeframe.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. The action is dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to timely serve Defendants and to prosecute the action.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The court on its own Read by a model
After careful consideration, Judge Tarnofsky issued a report (the “R&R”) recommending that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling the action at a later date pursuant to Rules 4(m) and 41(b).
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
The action is dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to timely serve Defendants and to prosecute the action.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
The action is dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to timely serve Defendants and to prosecute the action.
The delay claim Dismissed Read by a model
The action is dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to timely serve Defendants and to prosecute the action.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.