Passim

Mandamus decisions / District of Nevada

Owen Owhe v. USCIS

District of NevadaJames C. MahanDecided August 8, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01569

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
This case involves an immigration delay occurring at the Reno Field Office of Defendant U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service.
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A transfer order Read by a model
WHEREFORE, for the above reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court transfer this matter to the Reno Division of this District.
Motion decided Transfer Read by a model
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
Plaintiffs Ekugbere Owen Owhe and Diana Shermaine Cooper hereby move this Court to transfer this matter from the Las Vegas Division of the District of Nevada to the Reno Division.
Disposition Transferred to another court An order moving the case to another court. It decides where the suit is heard, not who wins, so it is not counted as either side's win. Read by a model
WHEREFORE, for the above reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court transfer this matter to the Reno Division of this District.
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
WHEREFORE, for the above reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court transfer this matter to the Reno Division of this District.
The delay claim Not decided here Read by a model
WHEREFORE, for the above reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court transfer this matter to the Reno Division of this District.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

Docket
No. 2:24-cv-01569
Filed
August 26, 2024
Ended
August 8, 2025
Suit's filing to its end
347 days
How it ended
Transferred
From the record
transfer order 2025-08-08

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.