Passim

Mandamus decisions / Southern District of Florida

TWINOVO INTERNATIONAL TRADING CORP v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)

Southern District of FloridaBeth BloomDecided March 4, 2026No. 1:25-cv-25641

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,917 written decisions from 2,664 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 7:07 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
USCIS moves to dismiss the Complaint as moot and attaches to its Motion a “Notice of Intent to Revoke”, ECF No. [17-1], which shows that USCIS acted on the underlying Petition and determined Weizhong Zhu to be ineligible.
Form or filing I-129 (worker petition) Read by a model
Twinovo International Trading Corp’s (“Twinovo”) L- 1A Petition
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
Plaintiffs’ Complaint seeking action on the Petition
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
For the reasons that follow, USCIS’s Motion is granted.
Motion decided Other motion to dismiss Read by a model
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (“USCIS”) Motion to Dismiss Complaint as Moot
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
Defendant’s United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (“USCIS”) Motion to Dismiss Complaint as Moot
Disposition Dismissed as moot Dismissed or denied as moot because the agency acted. Read by a model
As such, USCIS argues Plaintiffs’ Complaint seeking action on the Petition is now moot. The Court agrees with USCIS.
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
As such, USCIS argues Plaintiffs’ Complaint seeking action on the Petition is now moot. The Court agrees with USCIS.
The delay claim Moot: the agency acted Read by a model
As such, USCIS argues Plaintiffs’ Complaint seeking action on the Petition is now moot. The Court agrees with USCIS.
Months pending Not stated at filing The agency acted before this decision, so the months up to the decision are not a delay and are not shown. Read by a model
USCIS’s failure, over the course of a six-month period, to consider
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings Held moot Read by a model
As such, USCIS argues Plaintiffs’ Complaint seeking action on the Petition is now moot. The Court agrees with USCIS.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:25-cv-25641
Filed
December 2, 2025
Ended
March 4, 2026
Suit's filing to its end
92 days
How it ended
Ended once the agency acted
From the record
idb disp 6 (judgment: motion before trial), judgment for defendant

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.