Passim

Mandamus decisions / Middle District of Georgia

MEJIA MORALES v. STREEVAL

Middle District of GeorgiaClay D. LandDecided December 2, 2025No. 4:25-cv-00385

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency ICE Read by a model
On October 20, 2025, he was taken into United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) custody and has been detained since then.
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
The Court thus grants Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1).
Disposition Granted in part The principal motion was granted in part and denied in part. Read by a model
The Court thus grants Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus to the extent that the Court orders Respondents to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing
Prevailing party Each side in part Read by a model
Therefore, Petitioner’s claim for writ of mandamus is DENIED without prejudice.
The delay claim Relief denied Read by a model
Therefore, Petitioner’s claim for writ of mandamus is DENIED without prejudice.
The other claims Relief ordered Read by a model
the Court orders Respondents to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing to determine if Petitioner may be released on bond under § 1226(a)(2) and the applicable regulations.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
Nationality Mexico Read by a model
Petitioner is a native and citizen of Mexico

How the case ended

Docket
No. 4:25-cv-00385
Filed
November 16, 2025
Ended
December 2, 2025
Suit's filing to its end
16 days
How it ended
Judgment for the plaintiff
From the record
idb disp 6 (judgment: motion before trial), judgment for plaintiff

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why.

Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.