Passim

Mandamus decisions / Southern District of New York

Widakuswara v. Lake

Southern District of New YorkJ. Paul OetkenDecided March 28, 2025

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Not recorded Read by a model
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). For the reasons that follow, that motion is granted.
Motion decided Preliminary injunction or TRO Read by a model
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). For the reasons that follow, that motion is granted.
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”).
Disposition Granted in the applicant's favor The principal motion was granted in full: summary judgment for either side, an injunction or TRO, a writ or order to act, fees. A motion to dismiss granted in full counts as Dismissed; a transfer is listed apart. Read by a model
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). For the reasons that follow, that motion is granted.
Prevailing party Applicant Read by a model
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). For the reasons that follow, that motion is granted.
The other claims Relief ordered Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order is GRANTED.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.