Passim

Mandamus decisions / Western District of Michigan

Rondan Jarrett v. Kevin Raycraft

Western District of MichiganJane M. BeckeringDecided February 6, 2026No. 1:26-cv-00244

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,917 written decisions from 2,664 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 7:07 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency ICE Read by a model
On October 22, 2025, Petitioner was arrested and detained by ICE agents.
Form or filing I-485 (adjustment of status) Read by a model
With the petition, Petitioner also sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction staying Petitioner’s removal and requesting expedited consideration of his pending application for adjustment of status.
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
the Court will enter a Judgment granting Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
the Court will enter a Judgment granting Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
Disposition Granted in the applicant's favor The principal motion was granted in full: summary judgment for either side, an injunction or TRO, a writ or order to act, fees. A motion to dismiss granted in full counts as Dismissed; a transfer is listed apart. Read by a model
For the reasons discussed above, the Court will enter a Judgment granting Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
Prevailing party Applicant Read by a model
The Court will order Respondents to release Petitioner from custody, subject to any conditions that existed under Petitioner’s § 1182(d)(5)(A) parole.
The delay claim Not decided here Read by a model
the Court does not address other claims and other requested relief in Petitioner’s § 2241 petition.
The other claims Relief ordered Read by a model
The Court will order Respondents to release Petitioner from custody, subject to any conditions that existed under Petitioner’s § 1182(d)(5)(A) parole.
Months pending 15.9 months from the application to the court's decision Read by a model
Then, on October 11, 2024, Petitioner filed an application for adjustment of status under the Cuban Adjustment Act.
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
Nationality Cuba Read by a model
Petitioner is a native and citizen of Cuba.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:26-cv-00244
Filed
January 22, 2026
Ended
February 6, 2026
Suit's filing to its end
15 days
How it ended
Judgment for the plaintiff
From the record
idb disp 6 (judgment: motion before trial), judgment for plaintiff

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why.

Supreme Court and Sixth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.