Mandamus decisions / Eastern District of New York
Titov v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener
2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
USCIS
Read by a model
It is undisputed that USCIS has a non-discretionary duty to rule on asylum applications. |
|---|---|
| Form or filing |
I-589 (asylum)
Read by a model
Mikhail Titov, a Russian national living in Brooklyn, applied for asylum on April 5, 2022. |
| What the suit asked for |
Decide the asylum application
Read by a model
to compel the defendants—the United States Citizenship and Immigration, its director, and the director of its New York City Asylum Office (collectively, “USCIS”)—to adjudicate his application. |
| Kind of order |
A ruling on a motion or the petition
Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, USCIS’s motion to dismiss is denied. |
| Motion decided |
Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim
Read by a model
USCIS now moves to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). |
| Whose motion |
The government's motion
Read by a model
USCIS now moves to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). |
| Disposition |
Government's motion denied; the case goes on
The government's motion (to dismiss, or for summary judgment) was denied, so the case goes on. Counted as the applicant's ruling; a later decision in the case can still go either way.
Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, USCIS’s motion to dismiss is denied. |
| Prevailing party |
Applicant
Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, USCIS’s motion to dismiss is denied. |
| The delay claim |
The delay claim goes on
Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, USCIS’s motion to dismiss is denied. |
| Months pending |
47.1 months from the application to the court's decision
Read by a model
Mikhail Titov, a Russian national living in Brooklyn, applied for asylum on April 5, 2022. |
| TRAC factors | The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model |
| Threshold rulings | None Read by a model |
| Nationality |
Russia
Read by a model
Mikhail Titov, a Russian national living in Brooklyn |
How the case ended
- Docket
- No. 1:24-cv-05295
- On the docket
- This ruling (ECF 24)
- Filed
- July 30, 2024
- Ended
- March 27, 2026
- Suit's filing to its end
- 605 days
- How it ended
- Ended once the agency acted
- From the record
- stipulated dismissal 2026-03-27; idb disp 12 (dismissed: voluntarily)
A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.
The ruling's entry is the docket's one order or judgment entered the day of the decision. Both come from CourtListener's copy of the docket; check them there.
Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance