Mandamus decisions / Middle District of Florida

Albino Arellano v. Warden, Baker Correctional Institution (Baker County)

Middle District of FloridaWendy W. BergerDecided April 22, 2026No. 3:25-cv-01333

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency ICE Read by a model
On October 5, 2025, ICE detained Petitioner following a traffic stop in which Petitioner was a passenger in the vehicle.
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED.
Motion decided Other motion to dismiss Read by a model
Respondent Warden’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13) is DENIED as moot.
Whose motion Cross-motions Read by a model
1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED. 2. Respondent Warden’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13) is DENIED as moot.
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED.
The other claims Relief denied Read by a model
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
Nationality Mexico Read by a model
Petitioner is a citizen of Mexico

How the case ended

Docket
No. 3:25-cv-01333
Filed
November 4, 2025
Ended
April 22, 2026
Suit's filing to its end
169 days
How it ended
Dismissed on jurisdiction or the merits
From the record
idb disp 6 (judgment: motion before trial), judgment for defendant

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why.

Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.