Mandamus decisions / Northern District of California

Pallekonda v. Edlow

Northern District of CaliforniaRita F. LinDecided May 26, 2026No. 3:26-cv-04896

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by rule
similar facts, the court in Singh v. Jaddou, No. 22-cv-01180-RAJ, 2022 WL 4094373, at *2-4 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 2, 2022), aff’d sub nom., Babaria v. Blinken, 87 F.4th 963 (9th Cir. 2023)
Form or filing I-485 (adjustment of status) Read by rule
expeditious adjudication of their I-485 applications. The same is true here. The first factor (rule of reason) does not weigh in favor of Plaintiffs because their applications
Motion decided Preliminary injunction or TRO Read by rule
ENTRY OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

How the case ended

Docket
No. 3:26-cv-04896
Filed
May 22, 2026
Status
Pending as of the last docket check

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.