Passim

Mandamus decisions / Western District of Washington

Truong v. Scott

Western District of WashingtonTheresa L FrickeDecided September 24, 2026No. 2:26-cv-02553

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,917 written decisions from 2,664 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 7:07 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency ICE Read by a model
He is currently detained by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) at the Northwest ICE Processing Center (“NWIPC”) in Tacoma, Washington.
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
The amended habeas petition (Dkt. 15) is DENIED without prejudice.
Motion decided Preliminary injunction or TRO Read by a model
Petitioner’s motions for a TRO (Dkt. 9) and preliminary injunction (Dkt. 16) are DENIED as moot.
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
Before the Court is petitioner’s amended habeas petition filed under 8 U.S.C. § 2241 (Dkt. 15), and his motions for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) (Dkt. 9) and a preliminary injunction (Dkt. 16).
Disposition Denied in the government's favor The principal motion was denied in full: a motion to dismiss denied so the case goes on, or relief denied on the merits. Read by a model
The amended habeas petition (Dkt. 15) is DENIED without prejudice.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
The amended habeas petition (Dkt. 15) is DENIED without prejudice.
The other claims Relief denied Read by a model
The amended habeas petition (Dkt. 15) is DENIED without prejudice.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

Docket
No. 2:26-cv-02553
Filed
July 20, 2026
Ended
September 24, 2026
Suit's filing to its end
66 days
How it ended
Ended, outcome not recorded
From the record
terminated; no disposition recorded

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why.

Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.