Mandamus decisions / District of Nevada

Cruz v. United States Government

District of NevadaDecided May 29, 2025

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Not recorded Read by a model
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Some other action Read by a model
In his initiating 4 documents, Cruz essentially seeks an order to compel the United States to initiate and complete 5 deportation or removal proceedings prior to his release date
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ADOPTED in full.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
FURTHER ORDERED that Cruz’s liberally construed petition for writ of mandamus [ECF No. 20 |} 1] is DENIED
Disposition Denied in the government's favor The principal motion was denied in full: relief the plaintiff asked for denied on the merits, such as summary judgment, an injunction or fees. The government's motion denied so the case goes on is listed apart. Read by a model
FURTHER ORDERED that Cruz’s liberally construed petition for writ of mandamus [ECF No. 20 |} 1] is DENIED
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
FURTHER ORDERED that Cruz’s liberally construed petition for writ of mandamus [ECF No. 20 |} 1] is DENIED
The delay claim Relief denied Read by a model
FURTHER ORDERED that Cruz’s liberally construed petition for writ of mandamus [ECF No. 20 |} 1] is DENIED
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
Nationality Belize Read by a model
Cruz asserts that he is an immigrant to the United States and is a citizen of Belize.

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.