Passim

Mandamus decisions / Eastern District of California

(HC) Hurtadodominguez v. United States

Eastern District of CaliforniaDecided April 18, 2025

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency ICE Read by a model
with a filing labeled “ex parte quasi- 20 sovereign writ of mandate” against Respondents United States of America, Immigration and 21 Enforcement Customs (“ICE”), and Donald Trump (collectively, “Respondents”), filed on April 14, 22 2025.
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Some other action Read by a model
Petitioner prays that the Court mandate relief by ordering Respondents to deport him back to his birth 15 country of origin.
Kind of order A magistrate judge's recommendation Read by a model
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF 13 v. MANDAMUS WITH PREJUDICE
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The court on its own Read by a model
I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT 25 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 26 governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity.
Disposition Magistrate judge's recommendation A magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The district judge decides whether to adopt it, so it is not counted as either side's win. Read by a model
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF 13 v. MANDAMUS WITH PREJUDICE
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF 13 v. MANDAMUS WITH PREJUDICE
The other claims Dismissed Read by a model
the undersigned HEREBY RECOMMENDS th 3 || Petitioner’s petition for writ of mandamus (Doc. 1) be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.