Passim

Mandamus decisions / Eastern District of New York

Ramdial v. Bowes

Eastern District of New YorkDiane GujaratiDecided March 30, 2021

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
Instead, Plaintiffs propose a way that USCIS might review Plaintiffs’ applications while removal proceedings are ongoing.
Form or filing I-290B; I-485 (adjustment of status) Read by a model
Plaintiffs’ Applications to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (“Form I-485”) and their Motions to Reopen/Reconsider (“Form I-290B”)
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
For the reasons set forth above, the Transfer Motion, ECF No. 11, is DENIED and the Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED.
Motion decided Transfer Read by a model
For the reasons set forth above, the Transfer Motion, ECF No. 11, is DENIED and the Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED.
Whose motion A joint request Read by a model
the parties filed a joint motion and stipulation to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (a)
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
For the reasons set forth above, the Transfer Motion, ECF No. 11, is DENIED and the Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
Finding no basis to transfer this action, and lacking subject matter jurisdiction over it, the Court must dismiss the Complaint.
The other claims Dismissed Read by a model
For the reasons set forth above, the Transfer Motion, ECF No. 11, is DENIED and the Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.