Mandamus decisions / Eastern District of New York

Zhu v. McAleenan

Eastern District of New YorkLaShann Moutique DeArcy HallDecided November 17, 2020No. 1:19-cv-02543

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
On August 10, 2017, U.S.C.I.S. denied Petitioner’s I-485 application “even though she was an asylee, did not have [a] criminal record[,] paid federal income taxes, and developed community ties.”
Form or filing I-290B; I-485 (adjustment of status) Read by a model
On August 10, 2017, U.S.C.I.S. denied Petitioner’s I-485 application
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
Respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is GRANTED.
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, Respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is GRANTED.
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
Respondents move pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the complaint in its entirety.
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, Respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is GRANTED.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, Respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is GRANTED.
The other claims Dismissed Read by a model
Petitioner’s claims must be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Months pending 47.7 months from the application to the agency's action Read by a model
On August 10, 2017, U.S.C.I.S. denied Petitioner’s I-485 application
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings Section 1252(a)(2)(B) bar applied Read by a model
under 8 U.S.C. § 1255 over which this Court lacks subject- matter jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . (Respts.’ Mem. L. Supp. Mot. Dismiss (“Respts.’ Mem.”) 15, ECF No. 14.) The Court agrees.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:19-cv-02543
Filed
April 30, 2019
Ended
November 18, 2020
Suit's filing to its end
568 days
How it ended
Dismissed on jurisdiction or the merits
From the record
idb disp 3 (dismissed: lack of jurisdiction)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.