Passim

Mandamus decisions / District of Nebraska

Thigulla v. Jaddou

District of NebraskaRobert F. Rossiter Jr.Decided May 20, 2024No. 4:22-cv-03168

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,917 written decisions from 2,664 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 7:07 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), seeking to compel him to promptly adjudicate their applications to adjust their immigration status.
Form or filing I-485 (adjustment of status) Read by a model
their applications to adjust their immigration status.
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
seeking to compel him to promptly adjudicate their applications to adjust their immigration status.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
This case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The court on its own Read by a model
In accordance with the Eighth Circuit’s decision and remand order, IT IS ORDERED:
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
This case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
This case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
The delay claim Dismissed Read by a model
This case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings Section 1252(a)(2)(B) bar applied Read by a model
In accordance with the Eighth Circuit’s decision and remand order, IT IS ORDERED: 1. This case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 4:22-cv-03168
Filed
August 19, 2022
Ended
May 20, 2024
Suit's filing to its end
640 days
How it ended
Dismissed on jurisdiction or the merits
From the record
idb disp 3 (dismissed: lack of jurisdiction)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.