Mandamus decisions / Eastern District of Pennsylvania

TODUA v. MAYORKAS

Eastern District of PennsylvaniaDecided October 26, 2021No. 2:21-cv-02738

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
We cannot compel USCIS to approve Todua’s application to adjust status.
Form or filing I-485 (adjustment of status) Read by a model
Todua asks us to review USCIS’s denial of his I-485 application and grant mandamus relief in the form of an order compelling USCIS to reopen and grant his I-485 application.
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, we will grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim Read by a model
Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6)
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
Defendants seek dismissal of Todua’s amended complaint in its entirety.
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
We will dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint with prejudice as amendment would be futile.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, we will grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
The other claims Dismissed Read by a model
We will dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint with prejudice as amendment would be futile.
Months pending 8.4 months from the application to the agency's action Read by a model
On May 17, 2021, USCIS denied Todua’s third I-485 Application
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
Nationality Georgia Read by a model
Todua is an adult Georgian citizen.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 2:21-cv-02738
Filed
June 18, 2021
Ended
October 26, 2021
Suit's filing to its end
130 days
How it ended
Dismissed, ground not recorded
From the record
idb disp 14 (dismissed: other)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Third Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.