{"schema":"passim-mandamus-docket-endings.v1","run":"site-20261103T071210Z-26ffd2","court":"txnd","count":31,"endings":{"70603":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/75003432/8/siddiqui-v-edlow/","date":"2026-10-23","role":"ending","text":"Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court will not proceed amidst such  jurisdictional uncertainty. The Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudicate what Congress has said it cannot adjudicate, and [name] and Mohiuddin have failed to presen t any statutory authority proving the government lacks discretion regarding the actions they challenge. So the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE this case. [name] and Mohiuddin may refile their complaint within twenty-eight (28) days, which should address this Court's subject-matter jurisdiction over their claims to  avoid dismissal with prejudice.        (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 10/23/2026) (ndt)","entry_number":"8"}],"69806":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74858626/7/pathuri-v-mullin/","date":"2026-10-09","role":"ending","text":"ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 6 Motion to Dismiss. 6 Motion to Dismiss filed by [name] terminated. Before the Court is Plaintiff [name]'s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 6 ) The Court GRANTS the Motion and dismisses [name]'s claims WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All parties shall bear their own costs, attorneys fees, and expenses. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 10/9/2026) (chmb) (Entered: 10/09/2026)","entry_number":"7"}],"69966":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74755818/7/mendoza-v-mullin/","date":"2026-09-09","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER:  The Court will not proceed amidst such  jurisdictional uncertainty. The Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudicate what Congress has said it cannot adjudicate, and Mendoza has failed to present any statutory  authority proving  the government lacks discretion regarding the actions they challenge. The case is  thus DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Mendoza may refile his complaint within twenty-eight (28) days, which should address this Court's subject-matter  jurisdiction over their claims to avoid dismissal with prejudice.       (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 9/9/2026) (ndt)","entry_number":"7"}],"58567":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73307934/15/charaf-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2026-09-17","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting    11  MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Todd Blanche, Joseph B Edlow, Markwayne Mullin, Ryan R Raybould, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, and granting plaintiff leave to replead within 28 days.  (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 9/17/2026) (Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)","entry_number":"15"}],"58540":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72502010/22/zevallos-v-noem/","date":"2026-10-14","role":"ending","text":"ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES  MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court GRANTS the Government's  17  Motion to Dismiss. The Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the [name]'s Fifth Amendment Due Process claim . And the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the [name]'s remaining non-constitutional claims. The Court GRANTS the [name] leave to amend their complaint to cure the jurisdictional defects identified in this Order within 28 days of its issuance. This amendment is limited to the claims which the Court dismissed without prejudice. They may not add new parties or claims.  (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 10/14/2026) (twd)","entry_number":"22"}],"58515":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72192253/19/hamadneh-v-rubio/","date":"2026-07-24","role":"ending","text":"ORDER ACCEPTING  17  FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Case re:  1   Complaint filed by Leen Shadi Abou Salman, [name]. Plaintiffs' mandamus action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.   (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 7/24/2026) (cea)","entry_number":"19"}],"58499":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71969130/29/nichenametla-v-edlow/","date":"2026-07-27","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting  10  MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Joseph B Edlow, Kristi Noem, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; and denying as moot  20  MOTION to Dismiss without Prejudice Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) filed by [name].  (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 7/27/2026) (Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)","entry_number":"29"}],"58721":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70500300/16/alsalahat-v-garland/","date":"2025-11-04","role":"ending","text":"ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE     re:  15    Findings and Recommendations on Motion re:  10   Motion to Remand to Agency filed by Merrick  Garland,   United States Citizenship & Immigration Services.   (Ordered by Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor on 11/4/2025) (wxc)","entry_number":"16"}],"69597":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70141453/11/rodriguez-agustin-v-roark/","date":"2025-07-07","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Court determines is lacks  subject matter jurisdiction and, as a result, DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE all  claims in this action. Further, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE all other  outstanding motions.  (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 7/7/2025) (cfk)","entry_number":"11"}],"58355":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69192916/20/guliyev-v-us-department-of-homeland-security/","date":"2025-07-09","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER -   The Court finds that the Court has no subject matter jurisdiction over Mr. [name]'s claims under the Administrative Procedures Act and the Mandamus Act, and Mr. [name] has failed to state a claim under the Due  Process Clause and the Equal Access to Justice Act, and further amendment of his pleadings would be futile. Accordingly, USCIS's Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED, USICS's Rule 12(b)(5) Motion to Dismiss is DENI ED as moot, Mr. [name]'s claims under the Administrative Procedures Act and Mandamus Act are DISMISSED without prejudice, and Mr. [name]'s claims under the Due Process Clause and the Equal Access to Justice Act are DISMISSED.    (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 7/9/2025) (chmb)","entry_number":"20"}],"58349":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69159654/47/hartmann-v-jaddou/","date":"2026-03-12","role":"ending","text":"Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated, the Court GRANTS USCIS's  Motion to Dismiss (ECF No.  34 ) and DISMISSES [name]'s claims without prejudice.  Accordingly, the Court TERMINATES AS MOOT Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement the  Administrative Record (ECF No.  32 ).   (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 3/12/2026) (ndt)","entry_number":"47"}],"69436":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68396365/5/jaiswal-v-blinken/","date":"2024-04-02","role":"ending","text":"ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TRANSFER. Before the Court is the plaintiff's Motion to Transfer to Dallas Division. Dkt. No. 4 . The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 4/2/2024) (amg) (Entered: 04/02/2024)","entry_number":"5"}],"58277":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68379371/16/hernandez-macias-v-jaddou/","date":"2025-02-26","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court, therefore, grants Defendant Ur. Jaddou's Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, Motion to Sever and Dismiss (Doc.  10 ) and dismisses without prejudice this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court will enter a judgment by separate document pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.   (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 2/26/2025) (kcr)","entry_number":"16"}],"58255":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68240022/13/ayala-v-jaddou/","date":"2025-03-06","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting    7   Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/6/2025) (cfk)","entry_number":"13"}],"58193":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67812008/9/zhou-v-jaddou/","date":"2023-12-14","role":"ending","text":"ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 8 Joint Motion to Dismiss. This case is dismissed without prejudice with each party to pay its own costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 12/14/2023) (chmb) (Entered: 12/14/2023)","entry_number":"9"}],"58172":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67661642/21/davila-servin-v-jaddou/","date":"2024-10-10","role":"ending","text":"ELECTRONIC ORDER: Before the court is the parties' 20 joint stipulation of dismissal without prejudice. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/10/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 10/10/2024)","entry_number":"21"}],"58169":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67657636/21/omari-v-garland/","date":"2023-12-29","role":"remand","text":"FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONOF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re:  19   Motion to Remand.  Defendants'  Unopposed Motion to Remand Case and Stay All Deadlines should be GRANTED, and  this matter should be REMANDED to USCIS for fu rther proceedings consistent with  this recommendation. Additionally, the Clerk of the Court should be directed to  administratively close this case, pending a subsequent motion by either party to  reopen if further proceedings become necessary.  (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 12/29/2023) (axm)","entry_number":"21"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67657636/23/omari-v-garland/","date":"2024-01-25","role":"ending","text":"Order Accepting  21  Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the court grants  19  Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Remand; remands this action to USCIS for a decision on Plaintiff's Application within 30 days of the date of this order  or the date it is docketed, whichever is later. Further, the court administratively closes this action and directs the United States District Clerk to submit a JS-6 form to the Administrative Office, thereby removing this case from the statistical records.    (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 1/25/2024) (chmb)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":30,"quote":"remands this action to USCIS for a decision on Plaintiff's Application within 30 days of the date of this order  or the date it is docketed, whichever is later.","measured_from":"the date of this order"},"court_kept_jurisdiction":{"quote":"Further, the court administratively closes this action and directs the United States District Clerk to submit a JS-6 form to the Administrative Office, thereby removing this case from the statistical records.","value":true}},"entry_number":"23"}],"58156":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67543303/35/montilla-rodriguez-v-jaddou/","date":"2024-06-27","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Defendants'  30  Motion to Dismiss  and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Rodriguez's claims.     (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 6/27/2024) (agc)","entry_number":"35"}],"58681":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67508898/15/arciba-v-garland/","date":"2024-03-28","role":"ending","text":"Memorandum Opinion and Order:    Because 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v) precludes  judicial review of the USCIS's adjudication of a Form I-601A application, the  Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No.  11 ) and DISMISSES  Plaintiff's claims without prejudice.     (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/28/2024) (wxc)","entry_number":"15"}],"58140":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67451493/13/venkatesh-v-us-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2023-12-07","role":"ending","text":"Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss  (ECF No.  9 ) and DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with all costs taxed to  the party incurring same.  (Ordered by Senior Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 12/7/2023) (ndt)","entry_number":"13"}],"58677":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67231612/15/faustin-v-jaddou/","date":"2023-07-19","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiff's 13 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. The Court concludes that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/19/2023) (mmw) (Entered: 07/19/2023)","entry_number":"15"}],"58105":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67013571/14/mu-v-mayorkas/","date":"2023-07-12","role":"ending","text":"ELECTRONIC ORDER: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. See Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (docket entry 13 ). (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/12/2023) (chmb) (Entered: 07/12/2023)","entry_number":"14"}],"58029":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63648744/7/sivathanu-pillai-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2022-09-19","role":"ending","text":"ORDER re: 6 Notice of Dismissal. All Claims asserted in the above-styled and -numbered civil case action are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with costs taxed against the party incurring the same. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 9/19/2022) (axm) (Entered: 09/19/2022)","entry_number":"7"}],"58014":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63392603/6/mishra-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2022-08-22","role":"ending","text":"ORDER re: 5 NOTICE of Dismissal Voluntary Dismissal. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims asserted in the above-styled and -numbered civil action are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/22/2022) (oyh) (Entered: 08/22/2022)","entry_number":"6"}],"58007":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63361371/41/khalil-v-united-states-immigration-services/","date":"2023-09-08","role":"ending","text":"ORDER ACCEPTING  39  FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES  MAGISTRATE JUDGE.  Defendant's  28  Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.   (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 9/8/2023) (axm)","entry_number":"41"}],"68478":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/62635461/34/state-of-texas-v-biden/","date":"2022-04-06","role":"ending","text":"ORDER transferring case to the Dallas Division of the Northern District of [name]. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 4/6/2022) (nhp) (Entered: 04/06/2022)","entry_number":"34"}],"57924":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/61802369/6/seth-v-mayorkas/","date":"2022-02-14","role":"ending","text":"ELECTRONIC ORDER: : In light of 5 Notice of Dismissal, Plaintiffs claims against Defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively close this case. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/14/2022) (chmb) (Entered: 02/14/2022)","entry_number":"6"}],"57724":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60398619/20/ramirez-garcia-v-uscis/","date":"2022-08-12","role":"ending","text":"JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that the plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED, at the plaintiff's cost, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/12/2022) (mjr) (Entered: 08/12/2022)","entry_number":"20"}],"57700":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60054396/11/qadir-soran-v-united-states-department-of-state/","date":"2022-04-12","role":"ending","text":"ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 4/12/2022) (ygl) Modified restriction at direction from chambers on 4/18/2022 (cea). (Entered: 04/13/2022)","entry_number":"11"}],"57681":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59917813/17/karmacharya-v-garland/","date":"2021-11-24","role":"ending","text":"Findings and Recommendations on Motion re:  11   Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Merrick  Garland, Will  Bierman, Tracy  Renaud, Alejandro  Mayorkas.  For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, should be  GRANTED. [name]'s Complaint for Writ of Mandamus should be DISMISSED WITH  PREJUDICE as moot.     (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 11/24/2021) (ndt)","entry_number":"17"}],"68377":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59815977/145/state-of-texas-v-donald-j-trump/","date":"2022-08-06","role":"remand","text":"JUDGMENT/MANDATE of USCA as to 96 Notice of Appeal filed by Joseph R Biden, Jr, Tracy Renaud, Alejandro Mayorkas, United [name] of America, United [name] and Customs Enforcement, United [name] and [name], Tae Johnson, Troy Miller, United [name] Department of Homeland Security. Case remanded to the district court for further proceedings. Issued as Mandate: 8/6/2022. This cause was considered on the record on appeal and was argued by counsel. IT IS ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court is REMANDED to the District Court for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party bear its own costs on appeal. (awc) (Entered: 08/08/2022)","entry_number":"145"}]}}