{"schema":"passim-mandamus-docket-endings.v1","run":"site-20261103T071210Z-26ffd2","court":"ohnd","count":6,"endings":{"54529":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72307540/10/perez-frometa-v-director-cleveland-field-office-us-citizenship-and/","date":"2026-03-31","role":"ending","text":"Memorandum Opinion & Order Plaintiff's complaint for writ of mandamus seeks a ruling from this Court that Defendants have unreasonably delayed the processing of his I-485 application. Because the complaint, even when construed in Plaintiff's favor, does not set forth an unreasonable delay of the I-485 application, it must be dismissed. (Related documents 1, 7 ) Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 3/31/2026.(K,K) (Entered: 03/31/2026)","entry_number":"10"}],"54566":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69209104/13/andrews-v-united-state-department-of-state/","date":"2025-05-16","role":"ending","text":"Judgment Entry. In accordance with the 12 Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed contemporaneously with this Judgment Entry, it is ordered that: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. The Plaintiff's Complaint be, and the same hereby is, dismissed. SO ORDERED. Judge James G. Carr on 5/16/2025. (R,AP) (Entered: 05/16/2025)","entry_number":"13"}],"54502":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67177047/11/abdullaeva-v-attorney-general-of-the-united-states/","date":"2023-11-02","role":"ending","text":"Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED.   Judge Bridget Meehan Brennan on 11/2/2023.  (H,AR)","entry_number":"11"}],"54497":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64894289/14/amin-v-adams/","date":"2023-03-14","role":"ending","text":"Order on Motion to remand to agency","entry_number":"14"}],"54492":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63124676/16/abdallah-v-garland/","date":"2022-08-23","role":"ending","text":"Order of Remand","entry_number":"16"}],"54588":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/62606724/15/tran-v-director-of-the-us-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2022-09-08","role":"ending","text":"Memorandum Opinion and Order that given the impact of the pandemic and the lack of any allegation beyond the passage of time, this Court lacks jurisdiction to resolve the issues presented by [name]. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED. Judge John R. Adams on 9/1/22. (K,C)","entry_number":"15"}]}}