{"schema":"passim-mandamus-docket-endings.v1","run":"site-20261103T071210Z-26ffd2","court":"nysd","count":74,"endings":{"70128":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74664686/12/fuentes-v-miller/","date":"2026-09-08","role":"ending","text":"ORDER:  Based on the Parties' stating during the telephonic conference that Plaintiff has received approval  of her applications, the Court is dismissing this case. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to  terminate this case. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/8/2026)   (jjc)","entry_number":"12"}],"54210":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73542822/19/soare-v-edlow/","date":"2026-09-10","role":"remand","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  18   Stipulation and Order in favor of Joseph Edlow,  Markwayne Mullin, Susie Quintana against [name].  It is hereby ORDERED,  ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Stipulation and  O rder dated September 8, 2026, Plaintiff's Complaint and all claims therein are  hereby remanded to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) pursuant to  8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys' fees to any pa rty.  This remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action  if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for  naturalization (Form N-400) within sixty (60) days of the Stipulation and Order  of Remand being so-ordered by the Court.   (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 9/10/2026)  (Attachments:  # 1 Appeal Package)  (km)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":60,"quote":"This remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action  if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for  naturalization (Form N-400) within sixty (60) days of the Stipulation and Order  of Remand being so-ordered by the Court.","measured_from":"the Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"This remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action  if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for  naturalization (Form N-400) within sixty (60) days of the Stipulation and Order  of Remand being so-ordered by the Court.","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"}},"entry_number":"19"}],"54207":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73514790/7/garodia-v-mullin/","date":"2026-06-30","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: On June 22, 2026, this case was transferred from the U.S. District Court for  the District of Columbia. See Dkt. 6. In transferring the case, the Honorable  Sparkle L. Sooknanan left \"the decision to extend time to answer the Petition to  the  discretion of the transferee court.\" June 15, 2026 Minute Entry; see Dkt. 5 at 1  (\"Defendants move to extend their time to otherwise respond to the Complaint until  30 days after this action is docketed in the Transferee District.&qu ot;). The Defendants  shall answer or otherwise respond to the Petition by July 22, 2026. SO ORDERED.  Joseph B Edlow answer due 7/22/2026; Alissa Emmel answer due 7/22/2026; Markwayne Mullin answer due 7/22/2026; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services answer due 7/22/2026.  (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 6/30/2026)   (jca)","entry_number":"7"}],"54166":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73293867/25/islam-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2026-09-14","role":"ending","text":"OPINION & ORDER   re:  16     MOTION  for Summary Judgment . filed by [name],  17     MOTION   to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the alternative for summary judgment. filed by   United States Citizenship and Immigrati on Services. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and  Plaintiff's   motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to  terminate  the motions, Docs. 16 and 17, and close the case. It is SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/14/2026)   (jca)","entry_number":"25"}],"68611":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72079865/70/ahmed-v-rubio/","date":"2026-09-10","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  67    Opinion & Order.   in favor of [name], Kristi Noem, Marco Rubio, Pamela Bondi, [name]  B. [name], Todd M. Lyons against [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated i n the Court's Order dated September 8, 2026, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and the case is closed.    (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 9/10/2026)  (Attachments:  # 1 Notice of right to appeal)  (nd)","entry_number":"70"}],"54057":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71879431/32/w-v-noem/","date":"2025-12-29","role":"ending","text":"OPINION AND ORDER   re:  20     MOTION  to Dismiss . filed by Kristi  Noem, Todd M. Lyons, Susan  Raufer, Joseph  E. Kernan, [name]. Defendants' motion to dismiss on Rule 12(b)(1) grounds is GRANTED. S.W.'s  motion for a  preliminary injunction is DENIED. The Court STAYS this Order and  LEAVES THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER IN PLACE until the hearing and  determination of a motion by plaintiff for a stay pending an expedited appeal,  provided that any such motion shall have been filed no later than January 6,  2026. SO ORDERED.     ( Motions due by 1/6/2026.)  (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 12/29/2025)   (vfr)","entry_number":"32"}],"54049":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71715308/33/jiang-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2026-05-20","role":"ending","text":"ORDER:  On May 15, 2026, this Court issued a Stipulation and Order of  Dismissal. ECF No. 32. Pursuant to that Order, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close  this case. SO ORDERED.    (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 5/20/2026)   (ks)","entry_number":"33"}],"54033":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71537102/8/kerahroodi-v-rubio/","date":"2025-10-10","role":"ending","text":"ORDER : This action is hereby transferred to the United States District Court  for the Eastern District of New York. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(e)(1)(C), 1406(a). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to immediately transfer this action  to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 10/10/25)   (yv)","entry_number":"8"}],"68677":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70993525/111/african-communities-together-v-lyons/","date":"2026-09-30","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 110 Memorandum & Opinion, in favor of [name], The [name], Kristi Noem, Pamela Bondi, Sirce E. Owen, Todd M. Lyons against [name], The [name], Kristi Noem, Pamela Bondi, Sirce E. Owen, Todd M. Lyons. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated September 30, 2026, the Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Count I and is otherwise DENIED. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Count II and is otherwise DENIED. Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as to Counts III, IV and V is GRANTED. Judgment entered for plaintiffs on Count I and enter judgment for defendants on Count II, dismissing Counts III, IV and V, declaring the 2025 ICE Courthouse Arrest Policy arbitrary and capricious, and vacating and setting aside the January 2025 Interim Guidance and the May 2025 Final Guidance to the extent they purport to rescind the April 2021 Guidance as applied to civil enforcement actions in or near immigration courts. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 9/30/2026) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (tp) (Entered: 10/05/2026)","entry_number":"111"}],"53988":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70614949/13/salhab-v-noem/","date":"2025-08-04","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: On August 4, 2025, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal without  prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Dkt. No. 12. The Clerk of Court is directed to  close this case. SO ORDERED.       (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/4/2025)     (ar)","entry_number":"13"}],"53986":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70563142/22/chen-v-noem/","date":"2025-10-16","role":"ending","text":"ORDER:  Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the case is dismissed as moot.  Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed  to close the case and to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. [name] ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/16/2025)   (ks)","entry_number":"22"}],"53984":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70522859/16/leon-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services-uscis/","date":"2025-11-17","role":"ending","text":"ORDER:  On June 11, 2025 Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with this Court,  ECF No. 1, seeking to compel Defendants to adjudicate Petitioner's I-765 Work Authorization EAD application, which had been pending for nearly a year.  On November 14, 2025, Defendants filed a letter motion with this Court, ECF No. 14, requesting dismissal as moot. Defendants attached documentation of denial notices sent to Petitioner and his attorney regarding his I-765 application. ECF No. 14-1.  \"Because the sole issue in this casecompelling the adjudication of the [application]is moot, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action.\"  Balde v. Nielson, No. 18 Civ. 9597, 2019 WL 2387794, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. June 6, 2019). The Petition is therefore DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close this case. SO ORDERED.    (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 11/17/2025)   (ks)","entry_number":"16"}],"54308":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70354285/28/mostafavi-v-rubio/","date":"2026-08-20","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  27   Memorandum & Opinion.  It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated August 19, 2026, the Government's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and  DENIED in part. The Government's Motion is DENIED insofar as it seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims as moot or barred by the doctrine of consular nonreviewability. The Government's Motion is also DENIED insofar as it argues that ther e is no further agency action subject to judicial review under the APA. The Government's Motion is GRANTED, however, with respect to Plaintiffs' APA claims because the alleged delay is not unreasonable, as well as Plaintiffs' Mandamus  Act claim. This action is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiffs bringing a future action should [name]'s immigrant visa application remain pending for a period that constitutes an unreasonable delay; accordingly, the case is closed.   (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 8/20/2026)  (Attachments:  # 1 Appeal Package)  (tp)","entry_number":"28"}],"54307":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70313325/28/purini-v-scott/","date":"2026-09-30","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  27    Opinion & Order.   in favor of Kika Scott against [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated September 28, 2026, the Court GRANTS Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. The Court dismisses Petitioner's claims without prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed.    (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M. Hellwig on 9/30/2026)  (Attachments:  # 1 Notice of right to appeal)  (nd)","entry_number":"28"}],"53973":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70225227/27/lin-v-noem/","date":"2025-10-29","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  26   Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Kash Patel, Kika  Scott, Kristi Noem, Mollie Isaacson, Pamela Bondi against [name].  It is  hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's  O pinion and Order dated October 28, 2025, the Court has granted Defendants' motion to dismiss and dismissed without prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint in its  entirety. As discussed, the dismissal of Plaintiff's APA claim is without  preju dice to renewal should her application remain pending to an unreasonable  degree. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. The Court, however, retains  jurisdiction to resolve whether sanctions should be imposed on Plaintiff's counsel. See supra n.4.   (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 10/29/2025)  (Attachments:  # 1 Appeal Package)  (km)","entry_number":"27"}],"53944":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69787452/28/nagi-v-rubio/","date":"2026-06-26","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 27 Memorandum & Opinion, in favor of Marco Rubio, Rena Bitter against [name], [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated June 25, 2026, the Court grants Respondents' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and dismisses the Petition without prejudice; accordingly the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 6/26/2026) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (tp) (Main Document 28 replaced on 6/26/2026) (tp). (Entered: 06/26/2026)","entry_number":"28"}],"53935":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69720562/65/prisoners-legal-services-of-new-york-v-us-department-of-homeland/","date":"2025-08-25","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 30 MOTION to Transfer Case . filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, [name]. [name], [name]. Weighing the factors as described above, the Court finds that, on these facts, transfer of this action is warranted under § 1404(a). Defendants' motion to transfer this action to the Western District of [name] is therefore GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 30, and to transfer this case to the Western District of [name] without delay. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/25/2025) (sgz) (Entered: 08/26/2025)","entry_number":"65"}],"53933":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69718502/34/huma-therapeutics-ltd-v-us-department-of-state/","date":"2026-06-30","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  33   Memorandum & Opinion in favor of U.S. Department of  State, [name], [name], Marco Rubio against [name], [name], [name].  It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in  the Court's Opinion & Order dated June 29, 2026, the Court has granted  defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint. (Dkt. No. 23.) Plaintiffs have  failed to plausibly plead a claim of unreasonable delay pursuant to the AP A,  and plaintiffs' claim that defendants acted arbitrarily and capriciously is both  moot and unripe.   (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 6/30/2026)  (Attachments:  # 1 Appeal Package)  (km)","entry_number":"34"}],"53931":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69715414/9/gjokaj-v-noem/","date":"2025-05-07","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: The parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this action pursuant to  Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Dkt. No. 8. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED.    (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 5/7/2025)   (jca)","entry_number":"9"}],"53913":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69627977/14/ahmadi-pishkouhi-v-jaddou/","date":"2025-03-06","role":"ending","text":"ORDER ADJOURNING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE   re:  13   Proposed Stipulation and Order filed by Alejandro  Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou. In light of the Proposed Stipulation and Order of Dismissal filed on February 19, 2025 (doc. no 13) the Initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for March 24, 2025 is hereby adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED.    (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 3/6/2025)   (jjc)","entry_number":"14"}],"53894":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69496711/32/cowboy-world-corp-v-garland/","date":"2025-11-26","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  31   Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Merrick Garland,  Tracy Renaud against [name].  It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND  DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order  dated November 25, 2025, Respondents' motion to dismiss is granted; accordingly,  the case is closed.   (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 11/26/2025)  (Attachments:  # 1 Appeal Package)  (km)","entry_number":"32"}],"53825":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69242854/19/padmanabhan-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-11-26","role":"ending","text":"ORDER Upon consideration of Plaintiffs Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, it is hereby  ORDERED that the above captioned case is DISMISSED without prejudice against all Defendants.   (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 11/26/2024)   (jca)","entry_number":"19"}],"53822":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69236216/38/american-immigration-visa-kits-inc-v-su/","date":"2025-08-04","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  37   Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Lori Chavez-DeRemer against [name], [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated Augus t 4, 2025, the Court grants DOL's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because the dismissal is under Rule 12(b)(1), the dismissal is without prejudice to Visa Kits's right to file a new lawsuit properly alleging subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, the case is closed.   (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 8/4/2025)   (Attachments:  # 1 Appeal Package)   (tp)","entry_number":"38"}],"53818":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69224737/48/htoo-v-mayorkas/","date":"2025-01-28","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  47   Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Alejandro N  Mayorkas, Merrick B Garland, Ted H Kim, Ur M Jaddou against [name].  It is  hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's  Opinion and Order dated January 28, 2025, the Government's motion to dismiss is  GRANTED; accordingly, the case is closed.   (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 1/28/2025)  (Attachments:  # 1 Appeal Package)  (km)","entry_number":"48"}],"53805":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69196502/7/dong-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2024-10-07","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: Because Plaintiff consents and the interest of justice weighs in favor of transferring the case to the district that encompasses the court identified as the proper venue, this case is hereby transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to the E astern District of New York. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this case to the Eastern District of New York without delay. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order on Defendant and to retain proof of service. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 10/7/2024)   (sgz)","entry_number":"7"}],"53784":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69054270/10/gao-v-menges/","date":"2024-10-22","role":"ending","text":"STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, tl1at this action is herebydismissed without prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of theFederal Rules of Civil Procedure. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to CLOSE the case. (Signed by Judge Margaret M. Garnett on 10/22/2024) (jca) (Entered: 10/22/2024)","entry_number":"10"}],"53770":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68988281/41/ambati-v-us-citizenship-immigration-services/","date":"2025-07-10","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 40 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kika Scott, Kristi Noem against [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 10, 2025, the Court concludes that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over this case. Accordingly, the Complaint must be and is dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) (and the Court does not address Defendants arguments for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6)). Accordingly. The case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 7/10/2025) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (tp) Modified on 7/10/2025 (tp). (Main Document 41 replaced on 7/10/2025) (tp). (Entered: 07/10/2025)","entry_number":"41"}],"53756":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68943335/19/xing-v-jaddou/","date":"2024-11-07","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  18   Order of Dismissal in favor of Alejandro Mayorkas,  Andrea Quarantillo, Ur M Jaddou against [name].  It is hereby ORDERED,  ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated  Nove mber 6, 2024, Defendant's motion papers, the motion is GRANTED and the case  is dismissed substantially for the reasons stated in Defendant's memorandum of  law, namely that the action is moot and the Court therefore lacks subject-matter  j urisdiction. See ECF No. 15. Additionally, while leave to amend a complaint  should be freely given \"when justice so requires,\" Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), it  is \"within the sound discretion of the district court to grant or deny leave  to  amend.\" McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp., 482 F.3d 184, 200 (2d Cir. 2007).  Although courts should generally grant pro se plaintiffs leave to amend \"at  least once when a liberal reading of the complaint gives any indication that a   valid claim might be stated,\" Gomez v. USAA Fed. Sav. Bank, 171 F.3d 794, 795  (2d Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks omitted), the Court  declines to grant such leave here because amendment would be futile, see Cuoco  v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000); accordingly, the case is closed.   (Signed by Clerk of Court - Acting Daniel Ortiz on 11/7/2024)  (Attachments:  # 1 Appeal Package)  (km)","entry_number":"19"}],"53746":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68881328/23/ujka-v-mayorkas/","date":"2025-08-21","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 22 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Brian Garland, Thomas Cioppa, Ur M. Jaddou against [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated August 20, 2025, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's APA and Declaratory Judgment Act claims are dismissed without prejudice to their renewal should Plaintiff's application remain pending for a period of time that becomes unreasonable; Plaintiff's mandamus claim is dismissed with prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 8/21/2025) (km) (Entered: 08/21/2025)","entry_number":"23"}],"53716":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68523230/21/yang-v-nolan/","date":"2025-01-17","role":"ending","text":"OPINION AND ORDER   re:  13     MOTION   to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. filed by Alejandro  Mayorkas, Connie  Nolan, Merrick  Garland, UR  JADDOU. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED.  The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Dkt. No. 13. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 1/17/2025)   (tg) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.","entry_number":"21"}],"53711":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68499554/15/mongo-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-06-10","role":"ending","text":"ORDER ADJOURNING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE:  In light of the Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal filed on June 7, 2024 (doc.  no 14) the Initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for June 12,  2024 is hereby adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 6/10/2024)   (mml)","entry_number":"15"}],"53677":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68378911/25/al-ghazali-v-garland/","date":"2024-12-17","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 24 Order on Motion to Dismiss in favor of Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou against [name], [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Text Only Order dated December 15, 2024, and for the reasons discussed on the record at the December 12, 2024 conference, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 12) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's request for leave to amend is DENIED. Accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 12/15/2024) (tp) (Entered: 12/17/2024)","entry_number":"25"}],"53627":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68237236/15/rashed-v-blinken/","date":"2024-11-27","role":"ending","text":"OPINION AND ORDER   re:  7     MOTION   to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. filed by Antony J. Blinken, Rena  Bitter.  For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants the State Department's Rule 12(b)(6) motion and  dismisses the Complaint.  The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion pending  at Docket 7. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/27/2024)   (tg) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.","entry_number":"15"}],"53606":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68180396/17/shcheulnikov-v-cioppa/","date":"2024-11-13","role":"ending","text":"OPINION AND ORDER   re:  9     MOTION   to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. filed by Thomas A.  Cioppa.For the reasons set forth above, the Government's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 9 and CLOSE the case. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 11/13/2024)   (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.","entry_number":"17"}],"53586":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68106323/43/salla-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-07-10","role":"ending","text":"OPINION AND ORDER  re:  28     MOTION   to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , improper venue, and failure to state a claim  filed by   Alejandro Mayorkas,   US Customs and Border Protection,   Immigration & Customs Enforcement.   For these rea sons, Respondents' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk of  Court is directed to close Dkt. 28 and this case. SO ORDERED.       (Signed by Judge Arun Subramanian on 7/10/2024)   (vfr) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.","entry_number":"43"}],"53577":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68087309/24/elnaggar-v-garland/","date":"2025-01-10","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 23 Opinion & Order. in favor of Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou against [name]. [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated January 10, 2025, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 1/10/2025) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (nd) (Entered: 01/10/2025)","entry_number":"24"}],"53562":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68052818/35/kamel-v-us-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2025-08-01","role":"ending","text":"OPINION AND ORDER  re:  28     MOTION  to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. filed by Alejandro  Mayorkas, Ur  Jaddou,   U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. For the above reasons,  defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to  terminate Dkt. 28 and close this case. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Arun Subramanian on 8/1/2025)   (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.","entry_number":"35"}],"53560":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68045721/14/bacaj-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-02-01","role":"ending","text":"ORDER ADJOURNING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: In light of the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal filed on January 31, 2024 (doc. no 13) the  Initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for March 5, 2024 is hereby adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED.    (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 2/1/2024)   (tg)","entry_number":"14"}],"54280":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67930604/33/hamid-v-jaddou/","date":"2024-11-08","role":"ending","text":"OPINION & ORDER re:  29     MOTION   to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim  filed by Terri  Williams, Andrea  Quarantillo, L.  Rutherford, Ur  Jaddou, Susan  Quintana, Marie  Vilbrun.  For the foregoing reasons, Defe ndants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk  of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion, (ECF No. 29),  and close the case. SO ORDERED.    (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/8/2024)   (mml) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.","entry_number":"33"}],"53525":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67883811/15/maxhuni-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-06-20","role":"ending","text":"OPINION AND ORDER re: 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. filed by Thomas Cioppa, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Brian Garland, Ur M. Jaddou. For the reasons given above, Plaintiffs application for a writ of mandamus is DENIED and Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint is GRANTED. In so ruling, the Court notes that Plaintiff has now waited almost five years for a determination on his asylum application, a wait that he states-and which the Court does not doubthas exerted a considerable toll on him and on his family. His situation is a far cry from the 180-day period that Congress intended, and which USCIS continues to represent on its website as the timeline for decisions on asylum application. See U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., Questions and Answers: Affirmative Asylum Eligibility and Applications (updated Sept. 11, 2023), https://perma.cc/F4B8-SG5L (\"A decision should be made on your asylum application within 180 days after the date you filed your application unless there are exceptional circumstances.\"). The dismissal is therefore \"without prejudice to renewal, should Plaintiff's application for asylum remain pending without decision to an unreasonable degree.\" Konde, 2024 WL 2221227, at *5. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 10 and to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 6/18/2024) (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. (Entered: 06/20/2024)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":180,"quote":"See U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., Questions and Answers: Affirmative Asylum Eligibility and Applications (updated Sept. 11, 2023), https://perma.cc/F4B8-SG5L (\"A decision should be made on your asylum application within 180 days after the date you filed your application unless there are exceptional circumstances.\").","measured_from":"the date you filed your application"},"court_kept_jurisdiction":{"quote":"For the reasons given above, Plaintiffs application for a writ of mandamus is DENIED and Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint is GRANTED.","value":false}},"entry_number":"15"}],"53517":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67864713/27/qi-v-united-states-citizenship-immigration-services/","date":"2024-05-17","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  26   Memorandum & Opinion, Terminate Motions,,,,,,.   in favor of USCIS Office of the General Counsel, United States Attorney for the Eastern Disrict of New York, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services against [name] ao [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated May 17, 2024, the Government's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; accordingly, the case is closed.   (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 5/17/2024)  (Attachments:  # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal)  (nd)","entry_number":"27"}],"53500":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67790516/42/abdiev-v-garland/","date":"2024-08-09","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  41    Opinion & Order.   in favor of Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Susan Raufer, Ur Mendoza Jaddou against [name].It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated August 8, 2024, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted; accordingly, the case is closed.    (Signed by Acting Clerk of Court   Daniel Ortiz on 8/9/2024)  (Attachments:  # 1 notice of right to appeal)  (nd)","entry_number":"42"}],"53494":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67773918/44/rrmc-v-us-department-of-homeland-security/","date":"2024-12-10","role":"ending","text":"ORDER ADJOURNING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE granting 43 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. As the parties have reached a settlement in principle, the settlement conference in this matter currently scheduled for December 16, 2024, is hereby adjourned. The parties are directed to file a stipulation of dismissal or, in the alternative, a joint update as to the status of settlement discussions on or before Friday, January 24, 2025. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 43. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo on 12/10/2024) (rro) (Entered: 12/10/2024)","entry_number":"44"}],"53482":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67735157/32/motahari-v-blinken/","date":"2024-06-26","role":"ending","text":"OPINION & ORDER  re:  27     MOTION   to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim  filed by   Damian Williams, Christopher  Wray, Julie  Stufft, Anthony  Blinken,   Jane Doe.  For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' ; motion to dismiss is GRANTED.   Plaintiffs' request for oral argument is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Dkt. 27 and  to close the case.      (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 6/26/2024)   (vfr) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.","entry_number":"32"}],"53453":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67637476/41/kantamneni-v-united-states-department-of-homeland-security/","date":"2025-09-29","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER   re:  35     MOTION   to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. filed by   United States Department of Homeland Security. For the reasons stated above, Defendant's motion to dismiss ( Dkt. No. 35) is granted.  Dismissal is  without prejudice.  Leave to amend is denied.  The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the  motion (Dkt. No. 35), to enter judgment for Defendant, and to close this case. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/29/2025)   (tg) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.","entry_number":"41"}],"53435":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67606742/58/algazali-v-blinken/","date":"2025-01-31","role":"ending","text":"OPINION & ORDER   re:  45     MOTION   to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. filed by   Embassy of the United States of Cairo, Egypt, Anthony  Blinken,   United States Department of State. For the foregoing reasons,  the Government's  motion to dismiss the FAC for failure to state a claim is GRANTED. Defendant Blinken is  dismissed for the additional reason that he is not a proper party, an argument that  Plaintiffs did not oppose. Except for [name]'s s discrimination claim in Count Four, the claims in the FAC are  dismissed with prejudice and without leave to replead, as each claim is subject to a  legal infirmity that could not be cured with repleading. If [name] believes that he can  cure the  pleading deficiency in Count Four, by February 14, 2025, he shall file a  proposed Second Amended Complaint alleging only that claim and marked to show changes  from the FAC. The proposed pleading shall be filed as an attachment to a letter  explain ing the changes and how they cure the deficiency. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Dkt. No. 45.   (Amended Pleadings due by 2/14/2025.),   Anthony Blinken  (United States Secretary of State)   terminated.  (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 1/31/2025)   (rro)","entry_number":"58"}],"53424":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67551391/21/zheng-v-garland/","date":"2024-08-15","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  20     Opinion & Order.   in favor of Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Ted  H. Kim, Ur Mendoza Jaddou against [name].  It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated August 15, 2024, the Government's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; accordingly, the case is closed.  (Signed by Acting  Clerk of Court Daniel Ortiz on 8/15/2024)  (Attachments:  # 1 Notice of right to appeal)  (nd)","entry_number":"21"}],"53409":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67502874/19/malfi-v-jaddou/","date":"2024-06-18","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  18   Order on Motion to Dismiss in favor of Merrick B.  Garland, Susan Quintana, Ur M. Jaddou against [name].  It is  hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's  Or der dated June 18, 2024, [name]'s claim for declaratory relief are dismissed.  The Government's motion to dismiss at ECF No. 11 is GRANTED; accordingly, the  case is closed.   (Signed by Acting Clerk of Court Daniel Ortiz on 6/18/2024)  (Attachments:  # 1 Appeal Package)  (km)","entry_number":"19"}],"53408":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67500420/13/luo-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2023-08-30","role":"ending","text":"ORDER OF REMAND granting  8   Motion to Remand. The Court having considered the government's request to  remand this matter to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (\"USCIS\"), it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §  1447(b), this matter be remanded to USCIS for adjudication of Plaintiffs naturalization application (Form N-400) within 45 days of entry of this Order, without costs, expenses, or attorneys' fees to any party, and without prejudice to Plaintiff s ability, if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs Form N-400 within 45 days of entry of this Order, to reinstate this action by notice and motion filed with the Court and served on the government no later than 90 days after entry of this order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED.    (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/30/2023)    (jca) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.","terms":{"court_kept_jurisdiction":{"quote":"The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.","value":false}},"entry_number":"13"}],"53374":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67415820/18/konde-v-raufer/","date":"2024-05-16","role":"ending","text":"OPINION AND ORDER   re:  12     MOTION  to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. filed by Susan  Raufer.For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Defendant's motion to dismiss and  dismisses without prejudice Pl aintiff's Complaint in its entirety. As discussed,  the dismissal of Plaintiff's APA claim is without prejudice to renewal should  Plaintiff's application remain pending to an unreasonable degree. The Clerk of  Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 5/16/2024)   (jca)","entry_number":"18"}],"53348":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67280458/47/tharmabalan-v-blinken/","date":"2024-04-29","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  46  Opinion &  Order.   in favor of United States Department of State, Antony J. Blinken, Danette Sullivan against [name], [name].  It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the  reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated April 29, 2024, the Government's motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Docket # 27) is granted.  (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 4/29/2024)  (Attachments:  # 1 Notice of right to appeal)  (nd)","entry_number":"47"}],"53340":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67239667/33/jafarov-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2024-01-08","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT re:  32  Memorandum & Opinion in favor of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Loren Miller, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou against [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons  stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated January 5, 2024, the Court grants the Government's motion and denies [name]'s motion. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and the case is closed.  (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 1/8/2024)    (Attachments:  # 1 Appeal Package)   (tp)","entry_number":"33"}],"53320":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67145859/50/muslim-american-society-of-queens-v-us-citizenship-and-immigration/","date":"2026-04-27","role":"ending","text":"OPINION & ORDER  re:  32     MOTION  for Summary Judgment  filed by Alejandro  Mayorkas, Ur  Jaddou,   U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kathy A. Baran. For the reasons explained above, the parties' request to transfer the case  to the Eastern District of New York is GRANTED. The Defendants' motion for summary judgment and the Plaintiff's motion for discovery is reserved for consideration by the transferee court in the Eastern District of New York. The Clerk of Cou rt is respectfully directed to transfer the case to the Eastern District of New York and close the case on the docket of this Court.   (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 4/27/2026)   (sgz) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.","entry_number":"50"}],"53263":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66801068/8/nabaloum-v-raufer/","date":"2023-04-10","role":"ending","text":"STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 4/10/2023) (tg) (Entered: 04/10/2023)","entry_number":"8"}],"53218":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66651893/11/zhu-v-mayorkas/","date":"2023-01-26","role":"ending","text":"STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. So Ordered. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 1/26/2023) (mml) (Entered: 01/26/2023)","entry_number":"11"}],"53206":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66609452/58/alfar-v-quarantillo/","date":"2024-11-01","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  57   Memorandum   Opinion  & Order.   in favor of Andrea Quarantillo, Ur Mendoza Jaddou against [name].   It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorand um Opinion and Order dated October 31, 2024, the defendants' motion to dismiss is granted. Generally, leave to amend should be freely granted. See Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). Leave to amend should be granted in the absence of &quot ;evidence of undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, undue prejudice to the opposing party, or futility.\" Monahan v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Corr., 214 F.3d 275, 283 (2d Cir. 2000). For the reasons provided in the opinion, any amendment would be futile. The Amended Petition is therefore dismissed with prejudice.   (Signed by Acting Clerk of Court   Daniel Ortiz on 11/1/2024)  (Attachments:  # 1 Notice of right to appeal)  (nd)","entry_number":"58"}],"53135":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65384619/24/apg-gems-inc-v-mendoza-jaddou/","date":"2024-01-18","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT  re:  23   Order on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings,.   in favor of Alejandro Mayorkas, John  M. Allen, Ur Mendoza Jaddou against [name], [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memo Endorsement dated January 17, 2024, Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is GRANTED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 1/18/2024)  (Attachments:  # 1 Notice of right to appeal)  (nd)","entry_number":"24"}],"53026":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63996849/8/rao-v-us-department-of-homeland-security/","date":"2022-09-22","role":"ending","text":"STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/22/2022) (kv) (Entered: 09/22/2022)","entry_number":"8"}],"52938":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63362629/11/manolakakis-v-mayorkas/","date":"2022-10-27","role":"ending","text":"OPINION AND ORDER  re:  7     MOTION  to Dismiss . filed by Merrick  Garland,   District Director, Ur M.  Jaddou, Alejandro  Mayorkas. Defendants' September 15 motion is granted. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for the Defendants and close the case.   (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/27/2022)   (vfr) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.","entry_number":"11"}],"52894":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63287410/46/hettiarachchige-v-bitter/","date":"2022-12-16","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 45 Memorandum Opinion & Order. in favor of Antony Blinken, [name], [name]. Stufft, Martin Kelly, Merrick Garland, Rena Bitter, [name] against [name], [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion & Order dated December 16, 2022, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 12/16/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (nd) (Entered: 12/16/2022)","entry_number":"46"}],"52843":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63196900/8/zhou-v-jaddou/","date":"2022-04-07","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order on all Defendants in this action and retain proof of service.  The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this case to the Eastern District of New York without delay. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED.  (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 4/07/2022)   (ama)","entry_number":"8"}],"52811":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63118585/15/ceridor-v-mayorkas/","date":"2022-10-28","role":"ending","text":"STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL:IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 10/28/2022) (tg) (Entered: 10/28/2022)","entry_number":"15"}],"52731":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/62316821/19/sun-v-mayorkas/","date":"2022-05-12","role":"ending","text":"ORDER:   Pursuant to the letter from Petitioner at Dkt. No. 18, it is hereby ORDERED  that this action is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, and  all conferences and deadlines are CANCELLED. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 5/12/2022)   (va)","entry_number":"19"}],"52685":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/61611781/12/he-v-mayorkas/","date":"2022-05-13","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: On December 10, 2021, pro se petitioner filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. Dkt. 1. On February 11, 2022, respondents filed a motion to dismiss the petition. Dkt. 5. On May 11, 2022, the Court received prose petitioner's letter, re questing to \"withdraw\" his case. Dkt. 11. The Court construes this request as a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 5/13/2022)   (kv)","entry_number":"12"}],"52684":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/61610149/10/zhu-v-mayorkas/","date":"2022-05-09","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: On May 5, 2022, the Court received a letter from Petitioner asking to \"withdraw\" her case. See ECF No. 9. The Court construes Plaintiff's letter as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and mail a copy of this Order to the Petitioner. [name] ORDERED.    (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/6/2022)   (kv)","entry_number":"10"}],"54249":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/61600383/27/bland-v-blinken/","date":"2022-10-06","role":"ending","text":"STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. The Clerk shall close the case. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/6/2022) (mml) (Entered: 10/06/2022)","entry_number":"27"}],"52633":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60860295/27/mendoza-v-uscis/","date":"2022-04-08","role":"ending","text":"ORDER adopting  26   Report and Recommendations re:  14   Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction,  filed by   USCIS.  Objections to Judge Parker's Report & Recommendation were due April 5, 2022.  Dkt. No. 26  at 8. As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Report &  Recommendation have been filed. Thus, the Court reviews the Report & Recommendation for clear error,  and it finds  none.    The Court therefore adopts the Report & Recommendation in  its entirety and   GRANTS   the Defendant's motion. The Court dismisses with prejudice the Plaintiff's  amended complaint. This resolves docket number 14. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to  enter judgment in accordance with th e Report & Recommendation and close this case. The Clerk of Court is further respectfully asked to mail a copy of this Order to  the Plaintiff, [name], and note the mailing on the public docket. SO ORDERED.      (Signed by United States Circuit Judge Sitting by designation  Alison J. Nathan on 4/8/2022)    (vfr) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.  Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.","entry_number":"27"}],"52615":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60687669/10/almuntasser-v-mayorkas/","date":"2022-01-05","role":"ending","text":"ORDER denying as moot  9   Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. In view of the parties' agreement to  ask the Board of Immigration Appeals to remand Plaintiffs' petition to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for re-adjudication, see  ECF No.  9, the above titled action is administratively closed subject to the right of either party to  reopen within 30 days of termination of the administrative proceedings.  Any pending motions are  moot.  All conferences are canceled.  The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 9 and  close the case. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/5/2022)    (tg)","entry_number":"10"}],"52580":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60629039/46/keane-v-velarde/","date":"2022-09-07","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 45 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Adam N Bergeron, Barbara Q Velarde, KEN CUCCINELLI, Phyllis Coven against [name], [name], [name], [name]. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated August 19, 2022, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 8/19/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Leave to Appeal) (tp) (Entered: 09/07/2022)","entry_number":"46"}],"52546":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60382165/16/lin-v-garland/","date":"2022-04-04","role":"ending","text":"STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED. by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 15 and to close the case. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/4/2022) (ate) (Entered: 04/04/2022)","entry_number":"16"}],"52403":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59939927/4/arumugam-v-garland/","date":"2021-06-14","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: Accordingly, the Court directs that this matter be transferred to the United States District  Court for the Eastern District of New York. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 6/14/2021)   (rro) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.","entry_number":"4"}],"52378":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59888605/47/belem-v-renaud/","date":"2022-05-25","role":"ending","text":"OPINION   re:  38     MOTION   to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . filed by   U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Tracy  Renaud, Alejandro  Mayorkas,   U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Susan  Quintana. For the foregoing reasons,  Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to replace named Defendant Tracy Renaud with the  current Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur M. Jaddou.  The Clerk is further  directed to terminate all open motions and to close this case. SO ORDERED.   (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 5/25/2022)   (tg) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.","entry_number":"47"}],"52321":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59762383/11/lin-v-mayorkas/","date":"2021-05-21","role":"ending","text":"STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/21/2021) (kv) (Entered: 05/21/2021)","entry_number":"11"}],"52296":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59704194/9/meng-v-renaud/","date":"2021-03-25","role":"ending","text":"STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 3/25/2021) (nb) (Entered: 03/25/2021)","entry_number":"9"}]}}