{"schema":"passim-mandamus-docket-endings.v1","run":"site-20261103T071210Z-26ffd2","court":"nyed","count":194,"endings":{"69850":[{"date":"2026-10-20","role":"ending","text":"ORDER re 7 : The Notice of Voluntary Dismissal is approved. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mark this matter closed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 10/20/2026. (RI)"}],"69998":[{"date":"2026-10-13","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 6 stipulation of dismissal is so-ordered. This action is voluntarily dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The conference scheduled for 11/24/2026 is cancelled. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 10/13/2026. (AFK)"}],"70062":[{"date":"2026-10-06","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 6 stipulation of dismissal is so-ordered. This action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 10/6/2026. (AFK)"}],"70376":[{"date":"2026-08-12","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal. See ECF No. 7 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 8/12/2026. (PN)"}],"70400":[{"date":"2026-09-25","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) in light of the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal. (ECF No. 6 .) Case closed. Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 9/25/2026. (CQTH)"}],"70461":[{"date":"2026-09-23","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal. See ECF No. 9 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 9/23/2026. (PN)"}],"50467":[{"date":"2026-07-23","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal -- Plaintiff has filed notice of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Pursuant to that rule, the Court respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to mark this action closed. Ordered by Judge Natasha C. Merle on 7/23/2026. (SNK)"}],"50459":[{"date":"2026-10-14","role":"ending","text":"Order on Motion to Remand to Agency AND Order on Motion to Remand to Agency"}],"50430":[{"date":"2026-07-02","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 6 stipulation of dismissal is so-ordered. This action is dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The initial conference scheduled for 9/8/2026 is cancelled. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 7/2/2026. (JRC)"}],"50403":[{"date":"2026-07-24","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The parties' 5 stipulation of dismissal without prejudice is so ordered. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. So ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 7/24/2026. (TPL)"}],"51054":[{"date":"2026-06-30","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 8 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Markwayne Mullin, National Benefits Center, Todd Blanche, Scott Velez. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 6/30/2026. (KM)"}],"50354":[{"date":"2026-06-17","role":"ending","text":"ORDER. The stipulation of dismissal at ECF No. 7 is so-ordered, and the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 6/17/2026. (SH)"}],"50352":[{"date":"2026-07-24","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal. ECF No. 6 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 7/24/2026. (CBF)"}],"50284":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73236343/25/ali-bappi-v-rubio/","date":"2026-09-17","role":"remand","text":"SUMMARY ORDER : The Court remands Akters immigrant visaapplication to the Bangladeshi consular officials and orders them to re-adjudicate the application on an individualized basis under the INA and applicable regulations, and without regard to the Public Charge Pause, within 30 days of the entry of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close the case. So Ordered by Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 9/17/2026.  (MAA)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":30,"quote":"SUMMARY ORDER : The Court remands Akters immigrant visaapplication to the Bangladeshi consular officials and orders them to re-adjudicate the application on an individualized basis under the INA and applicable regulations, and without regard to the Public Charge Pause, within 30 days of the entry of this Order.","measured_from":"the entry of this Order"},"court_kept_jurisdiction":{"quote":"The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close the case.","value":false}},"entry_number":"25"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73236343/26/ali-bappi-v-rubio/","date":"2026-09-18","role":"remand","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Akter's immigrant visa application is remanded to the Bangladeshi consular officials and they are ordered to re-adjudicate the application on an individualized basis under the INA and applicable regulations, and without regard to the Public Charge Pause, within 30 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 9/18/2026. (JP) (Entered: 09/18/2026)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":30,"quote":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Akter's immigrant visa application is remanded to the Bangladeshi consular officials and they are ordered to re-adjudicate the application on an individualized basis under the INA and applicable regulations, and without regard to the Public Charge Pause, within 30 days of the entry of this Order.","measured_from":"the entry of this Order"}},"entry_number":"26"}],"50277":[{"date":"2026-05-18","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 6 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 5/18/2026. (OA)"}],"51041":[{"date":"2026-06-26","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: The Stipulation of Remand found at docket entry No. 10 is hereby SO ORDERED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case and send a certified copy of this Order to USCIS.So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 6/26/2026. (JT)"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73189755/11/ghobrial-v-blanche/","date":"2026-07-09","role":"remand","text":"JUDGMENT: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Complaint and all claims therein are remanded to USCIS pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys' fees to any party; that remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-440) within sixty (60) days of the order; that if Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between 61 and 90 days from the date of the order, the action shall be deemed to be dismissed with prejudice; and that this case is closed. Ordered by Clerk of Court on 7/9/2026. (GO) (Entered: 07/09/2026)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":60,"quote":"that remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-440) within sixty (60) days of the order;","measured_from":"the order"},"if_not_reinstated":{"quote":"that if Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between 61 and 90 days from the date of the order, the action shall be deemed to be dismissed with prejudice;","result":"dismissed_with_prejudice"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"that remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-440) within sixty (60) days of the order;","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"},"court_kept_jurisdiction":{"quote":"and that this case is closed.","value":false}},"entry_number":"11"}],"50247":[{"date":"2026-05-04","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 7 stipulation of dismissal is so-ordered. This action is dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The initial conference scheduled for 7/13/2026 is cancelled. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 5/4/2026. (JC)"}],"51042":[{"date":"2026-07-21","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice re 6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by [name].Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 7/21/2026. (JT)"}],"50241":[{"date":"2026-06-15","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE -- The parties' stipulation of dismissal without prejudice pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is So Ordered. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Cross-Goldenberg on 6/15/2026. (CBG)"}],"68943":[{"date":"2026-09-14","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: In light of the notice of voluntary dismissal 87, the Clerk of Court is directed to remove F.R.P. from the docket. So Ordered by Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 9/14/2026. (BEM)"}],"50235":[{"date":"2026-09-26","role":"ending","text":"ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO USCIS: Defendants' 12 response to the Court's 10 Order to Show Cause requests that the Court remand Plaintiff's Complaint and claims to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (\"USCIS\") pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b) on the condition that USCIS be afforded 45 days to adjudicate Plaintiff's Form N-400 application. Accordingly, the Court construes Defendants' 12 response as a motion to remand to USCIS. Plaintiff does not oppose remand to USCIS, and in fact encourages it, but requests that the remand afford USCIS only 21 days, not 45 days, to adjudicate her application. Plaintiff's only argument for a 21-day period is that other orders in this District have provided for either 21-day or 30-day periods in similar circumstances, (see Dkt. 13, at 2; see also Dkt. 12, at 2-3 (collecting cases)), but this is an entirely discretionary decision for the Court. Plaintiff points to no particular harm or prejudice that will result from permitting USCIS 45 days to adjudicate her application other than the potential for limited delay. The Court grants the motion to remand and hereby orders that Plaintiff's Complaint and all claims therein are remanded to USCIS pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys' fees to any party, subject to the following condition: This remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-400) within forty-five (45) days of this Order. Plaintiff is granted leave to reopen this case and file an amended complaint within ninety (90) days, but no earlier than forty-five (45) days, should Defendants fail to adjudicate her application. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment consistent with this Order and close the case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/26/2026. (MBH)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":45,"quote":"Complaint and all claims therein are remanded to USCIS pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys' fees to any party, subject to the following condition: This remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-400) within forty-five (45) days of this Order.","measured_from":"this Order"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"Complaint and all claims therein are remanded to USCIS pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys' fees to any party, subject to the following condition: This remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-400) within forty-five (45) days of this Order.","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"},"court_kept_jurisdiction":{"quote":"The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment consistent with this Order and close the case.","value":false}}}],"50225":[{"date":"2026-05-11","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal, e-filed as 6 on May 11, 2026, the instant action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 5/11/2026. (EAG)"}],"50186":[{"date":"2026-07-09","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Plaintiff filed a Complaint on March 17, 2026, on behalf of his spouse, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and a writ of mandamus related to his spouse's I-130 application. On May 26, 2026, Defendants filed a pre-motion conference letter 7 in anticipation of a motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and explaining that, on April 6, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (\"USCIS\") issued Plaintiff's spouse an interview notice in connection with her I-130 application. Defendants represent that the asylum interview was scheduled for May 12, 2026, and on May 12, 2026, USCIS issued a notice approving Plaintiff's spouse's I-130. See [7-1]. The Court ordered Plaintiff to respond to the Defendants' letter by June 3, 2026. Plaintiff has not responded. The Administrative Procedure Act permits federal courts to compel agency action that has been \"unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed,\" 5 U.S.C. § 706(1), unless another statute precludes judicial review. 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(1). USCIS's approval of the I-130 application demonstrates the absence of the agency-inaction predicate of an undue-delay suit. As Defendants have approved the I-130 application, Plaintiff's writ of mandamus is now moot. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Xian Yong Zeng ex rel. Tie Liu v. Kerry, 266 F. Supp. 3d 645, 647-48 (E.D.N.Y. 2017) (\"Because the Consulate has issued a decision..., the plaintiff's request to direct the Consulate to adjudicate the application is moot [and]... the plaintiff's claim is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.\"), aff'd sub nom. Xian Yong Zeng v. Pompeo, 740 F. App'x 9 (2d Cir. 2018). The Court hereby dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Ordered by Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 7/9/2026. (TPL)"}],"51024":[{"date":"2026-08-10","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 11 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Joseph B. Edlow, Kristi Noem, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Pamela Bondi. This case is dismissed without prejudice. So ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 8/10/2026. (KY)"}],"50160":[{"date":"2026-04-03","role":"ending","text":"ELECTRONIC ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 10 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Kristi Noem, Pam Bondi, [name]. [name]. Ordered by Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 4/3/2026. (MV)"}],"50134":[{"date":"2026-06-02","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal. ECF No. 7 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 6/2/2026. (SMR)"}],"50058":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72147544/12/li-v-garland/","date":"2026-06-02","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 6/2/2026. (JP) (Entered: 06/02/2026)","entry_number":"12"}],"68973":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72136921/11/alcantara-moreno-v-noem/","date":"2026-07-23","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, Defendants'  7  motion to dismiss is granted. This case is hereby dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 7/23/2026. (TSB)","entry_number":"11"}],"50049":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72132652/9/tang-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2026-03-31","role":"remand","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Plaintiffs Complaint and all claims therein are hereby remanded to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys fees to any party; and this remand is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-400) within sixty (60) days of this Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court. If Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between 61 and 90 days from the date this Stipulation and Order of Remand is so-ordered, this action shall be deemed to be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 3/31/26. (JP) (Entered: 04/01/2026)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":60,"quote":"and this remand is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-400) within sixty (60) days of this Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court.","measured_from":"this Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court"},"if_not_reinstated":{"quote":"If Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between 61 and 90 days from the date this Stipulation and Order of Remand is so-ordered, this action shall be deemed to be dismissed with prejudice.","result":"dismissed_with_prejudice"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"and this remand is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-400) within sixty (60) days of this Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court.","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"}},"entry_number":"9"}],"50002":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72002457/13/hossain-v-noem/","date":"2026-03-12","role":"ending","text":"ORDER. Pursuant to the 12 Stipulation of Dismissal, e-filed on March 12, 2026, the instant case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 3/12/2026. (EAG) (Entered: 03/12/2026)","entry_number":"13"}],"49997":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72001391/48/ghafar-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2026-09-23","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons discussed in the attached Memorandum and Order, Defendants'  23  motion to dismiss is granted, and Plaintiff's  39  motion for reconsideration is denied.  Accordingly, Plaintiff's  1  complaint is  dismissed without prejudice to refile if there is a continued delay and Plaintiff is able to state additional facts or causes of action.  The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case.  The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order, the judgment, and the docket sheet to pro se Plaintiff and to note the mailing on the docket.  Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 9/23/2026.  (MMP)","entry_number":"48"}],"49962":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71907601/20/rehman-v-united-states-citizenship-immigration-services/","date":"2026-03-27","role":"ending","text":"ORDER TO REMAND : This remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's N-400 application within sixty (60) days from the date of entry of this Remand Order. If Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between sixty-one. (61) and ninety (90) days from the date of entry of this Remand Order, this action shall bedeemed to be dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a judgment in accordance with Remand Order.Ordered by Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 3/27/2026. (MAA) (Entered: 03/27/2026)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":60,"quote":"ORDER TO REMAND : This remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's N-400 application within sixty (60) days from the date of entry of this Remand Order.","measured_from":"the date of entry of this Remand Order"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"ORDER TO REMAND : This remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's N-400 application within sixty (60) days from the date of entry of this Remand Order.","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"}},"entry_number":"20"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71907601/21/rehman-v-united-states-citizenship-immigration-services/","date":"2026-03-27","role":"remand","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Plaintiff [name]'s Complaint (ECF 1) and all claims therein are hereby remanded to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (\"USCIS\") pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys' fees to any party. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 3/27/2026. (JP) (Entered: 03/27/2026)","entry_number":"21"}],"51000":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71889966/25/yao-v-bondi/","date":"2026-04-30","role":"ending","text":"JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs [name] and [name] take nothing of Defendants Pamela Bondi, Kristi Noem, Joseph B. Edlow, and Andrea Quarantillo; that the case is dismissed as moot; that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal; and that this case is closed. Ordered by Clerk of Court on 4/30/2026. (JC) (Entered: 04/30/2026)","entry_number":"25"}],"50995":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71643501/12/hassan-v-nocella-jr/","date":"2026-01-12","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: The parties' stipulation to remand to USCIS 11 is so ordered. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. So Ordered by Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 1/12/2026. (LMR) (Entered: 01/12/2026)","entry_number":"12"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71643501/13/hassan-v-nocella-jr/","date":"2026-01-13","role":"remand","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Complaint and all claims therein are remanded to USCIS pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys fees to any party; that remand is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-440) within sixty (60) days of January 12, 2026; that if Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between 61 and 90 days from January 12, 2026, the action shall be deemed to be dismissed with prejudice; and that this case is closed. Ordered by Clerk of Court on 1/13/2026. (JC) (Entered: 01/13/2026)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":60,"quote":"that remand is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-440) within sixty (60) days of January 12, 2026;","from_date":"2026-01-12","measured_from":"January 12, 2026"},"if_not_reinstated":{"quote":"that if Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between 61 and 90 days from January 12, 2026, the action shall be deemed to be dismissed with prejudice;","result":"dismissed_with_prejudice"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"that remand is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-440) within sixty (60) days of January 12, 2026;","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"},"court_kept_jurisdiction":{"quote":"and that this case is closed.","value":false}},"entry_number":"13"}],"49883":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71499026/13/kazmi-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2025-12-22","role":"remand","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Plaintiffs Complaint and all claims therein are remanded to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys fees to any party; and this remand is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-400) within sixty (60) days of this Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court; and if Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between 61 and 90 days from the date this Stipulation and Order of Remand is so-ordered, this action shall be deemed to be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 12/22/2025. (JP) (Entered: 12/22/2025)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":60,"quote":"and this remand is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-400) within sixty (60) days of this Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court;","measured_from":"this Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court"},"if_not_reinstated":{"quote":"and if Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between 61 and 90 days from the date this Stipulation and Order of Remand is so-ordered, this action shall be deemed to be dismissed with prejudice.","result":"dismissed_with_prejudice"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"and this remand is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-400) within sixty (60) days of this Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court;","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"}},"entry_number":"13"}],"49871":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71428819/11/fatima-v-rubio/","date":"2026-09-29","role":"ending","text":"ORDER granting  7   Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction;  finding as moot  7   Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim  -  For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Defendants' motion to dismiss this action fo r lack of jurisdiction is granted and the motion for failure to state a claim is terminated as moot.  Accordingly, this action is dismissed and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.  SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 9/29/2026.  (Irizarry, Dora)","entry_number":"11"}],"49865":[{"date":"2026-01-21","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 6 Stipulation of Dismissal by Angelica Alfonso-Royals, Joseph B. Edlo, Alissa L. Emmel, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. So Ordered by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 1/21/2026. (CC)"}],"49852":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71323252/9/rahman-v-jaddou/","date":"2026-03-26","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 8, Stipulation of Dismissal. So Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 3/26/2026. (CCF) (Entered: 03/26/2026)","entry_number":"9"}],"49845":[{"date":"2025-11-13","role":"ending","text":"ORDER. The stipulation of dismissal at ECF No. [7 is so ordered, and the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. The Court will mail this Order to [name], 4039 24th Street, [address]. (Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 11/13/2025. (SH) Modified on 11/13/2025 (SH)."}],"50989":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71264629/14/chevalier-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2025-11-07","role":"remand","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Complaint and all claims therein are remanded to USCIS pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys' fees to any party; that remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-440) within thirty (30) days of November 5, 2025; that if Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between 31 and 60 days from November 5, 2025, the action shall be deemed to be dismissed with prejudice; and that this case is closed. Ordered by Clerk of Court on 11/7/2025. (JT) (Entered: 11/07/2025)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":30,"quote":"that remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-440) within thirty (30) days of November 5, 2025;","from_date":"2025-11-05","measured_from":"November 5, 2025"},"if_not_reinstated":{"quote":"that if Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between 31 and 60 days from November 5, 2025, the action shall be deemed to be dismissed with prejudice;","result":"dismissed_with_prejudice"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"that remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-440) within thirty (30) days of November 5, 2025;","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"},"court_kept_jurisdiction":{"quote":"and that this case is closed.","value":false}},"entry_number":"14"}],"49830":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71228495/7/bai-v-united-states-citizenship-immigration-services/","date":"2025-12-17","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 12/17/2025. (JP) (Entered: 12/17/2025)","entry_number":"7"}],"49810":[{"date":"2025-10-24","role":"remand","text":"ORDER: The government's 27 motion to remand the case to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (\"USCIS\") is granted. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), \"a naturalization applicant can bring a petition to the district court when United States Citizenship and Immigration Services has not decided the application for more than 120 days\" after the applicant's initial examination. Bustamonte v. Napolitano, 582 F.3d 403, 403-04 (2d Cir. 2009). While a proper Section 1447(b) petition vests jurisdiction in this Court, id. at 409, this Court may \"determine the matter directly,\" or \"remand the matter, with appropriate instructions, to the Service to determine the matter.\" 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b). Courts in this Circuit appear to find that this decision rests with the Court's equitable discretion. Althnaibat v. Wolf, No. 19-CV-3245, 2020 WL 4883890, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2020); Tochaei v. Kelly, No. 17-CV-654, 2018 WL 1768276, at *2 (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 12, 2018).The Court exercises that discretion to remand this case to USCIS. The USCIS is \"charged with primary naturalization responsibility.\" See Ajlani v. Chertoff, 545 F.3d 229, 241 (2d Cir. 2008). \"Generally speaking, a court of appeals should remand a case to an agency for decision of a matter that statutes place primarily in agency hands.\" INS v. Orlando Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-17 (2002); Tochaei, 2018 WL 1768276, at *2. Though plaintiff may be differently positioned from the petitioner in INS v. Orlando Ventura, as he observes in his 30 supplemental response, the Supreme Court's admonition that agencies are better equipped than this Court to handle immigration matters applies broadly--and to this case. Given USCIS's expertise in assessing naturalization applications, Ahmed v. Rosen, No. 21-CV-76, 2021 WL 612300, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2021), and given the agency's commitment to issuing a prompt decision within 60 days of remand, Def.'s Letter 3 (Dkt. #27), this Court favors remanding even if \"the administrative record\" might be \"fully developed\" at this juncture, Pl.'s Resp. 1 (Dkt. #29). If plaintiff is correct that USCIS would wrongfully deny his application, he may seek de novo review from this Court under 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c). For the foregoing reasons, the 27 motion for remand is granted. Plaintiff's complaint is hereby remanded to USCIS pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys' fees to any party. This remand is without prejudice to plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on plaintiff's Form N-400, Application for Naturalization within sixty (60) days of this order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the case. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 10/24/2025. (AG).","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":60,"quote":"This remand is without prejudice to plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on plaintiff's Form N-400, Application for Naturalization within sixty (60) days of this order.","measured_from":"this order"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"This remand is without prejudice to plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on plaintiff's Form N-400, Application for Naturalization within sixty (60) days of this order.","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"},"court_kept_jurisdiction":{"quote":"The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the case.","value":false}}},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71201214/34/abuelenin-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2025-10-27","role":"remand","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that the motion for remand is granted; Plaintiff's complaint is hereby remanded to USCIS pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys' fees to any party; and this remand is without prejudice to plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on plaintiff's Form N-400, Application for Naturalization within sixty (60) days of this order. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 10/27/2025. (JP) (Entered: 10/27/2025)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":60,"quote":"and this remand is without prejudice to plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on plaintiff's Form N-400, Application for Naturalization within sixty (60) days of this order.","measured_from":"this order"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"and this remand is without prejudice to plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on plaintiff's Form N-400, Application for Naturalization within sixty (60) days of this order.","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"}},"entry_number":"34"},{"date":"2025-10-28","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: The Court construes plaintiff's 33 request for continued supervision of the USCIS as a motion to reconsider and modify its prior order remanding this case. That motion is denied. The decision to grant or deny a motion for reconsideration falls within the district court's discretion. Cooper v. Lapra, No. 18-CV-9405 (KPF), 2020 WL 7027592, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020). But such a motion \"should be granted only when the [plaintiff] identifies 'an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.'\" Kolel Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, Inc. v. YLL Irrevocable Tr., 729 F.3d 99, 104 (2d Cir. 2013) (quoting Virgin Atl. Airways, Ltd. v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 956 F.2d 1245, 1255 (2d Cir. 1992)). Plaintiff suggests that USCIS will fail to timely resolve his naturalization application, introduce fabricated evidence, and violate his rights under the Due Process Clause and the Rehabilitation Act. But as the Court noted in its prior order, plaintiff retains the rights to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on his naturalization application within sixty days, and to seek de novo review under 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c) if his application is denied. Those reservations adequately protect him from the concerns alleged in his motion. Therefore, plaintiff has not identified new law, new evidence, or a need to modify its motion to prevent a manifest injustice. Plaintiff is advised that the case is now closed, without prejudice to his right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on his naturalization application within sixty days of this Court's 10/24/2025 Order. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 10/28/2025. (AG)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":60,"quote":"But as the Court noted in its prior order, plaintiff retains the rights to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on his naturalization application within sixty days, and to seek de novo review under 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c) if his application is denied."},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"But as the Court noted in its prior order, plaintiff retains the rights to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on his naturalization application within sixty days, and to seek de novo review under 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c) if his application is denied.","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"}}}],"49619":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70252419/21/dagbazhalsanova-v-allen/","date":"2026-06-02","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached order, Defendant's motion to dismiss  15  is granted and this case is dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment consistent with this order and close this case. Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 6/2/2026.   (IVK)","entry_number":"21"}],"49606":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70216102/11/foster-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2025-09-05","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 9/5/2025. (JP) (Entered: 09/05/2025)","entry_number":"11"}],"50964":[{"date":"2025-06-05","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) in light of the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal (ECF No. 7 ). Case closed. Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 6/5/2025. (RDP)"}],"49557":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69903006/21/mbachu-v-noem/","date":"2026-05-25","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, Defendants'  19  motion to dismiss is granted. Plaintiffs'  1  complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice to refile if there is a continued delay and Plaintiffs are able to state additional facts or causes of action. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 5/25/2026. (TSB)","entry_number":"21"}],"49551":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69905106/5/medrano-morales-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2025-08-08","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants; and that the Complaint, ECF No. 1, is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 8/8/2025. (JP) (Entered: 08/08/2025)","entry_number":"5"}],"49528":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69838450/11/abasov-v-united-states-citizen-and-immigration-services-uscis/","date":"2025-12-22","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants Defendants'  7  motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim.  Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).  At some point, however, &q uot;Defendants' continued failure to act on Plaintiff['s] asylum application, if it continues, may be so severe as to give rise to an [Administrative Procedure Act] violation.\"  Abdiev v. Garland, No. 23-CV-8091 (DEH), 2024 WL 3 742545, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2024).  The Court therefore dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice, so Plaintiff may refile \"should [his] application for asylum remain pending without decision to an unreasonable degree.\"  Konde v. Raufer, No. 23-CV-4265 (JPC), 2024 WL 2221227, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. May 16, 2024). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 12/22/2025.  (ABB)","entry_number":"11"}],"49508":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69785167/11/shen-v-us-us-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2026-03-10","role":"ending","text":"ORDER:  For the reasons outlined in the enclosed order, the defendant's motion to dismiss is granted.  The dismissal is with prejudice, \"as repleading cannot cure the defects of [her] mandamus claim.\"  See Ji v. USCIS, No. 24-CV -4815, 2026 WL 171879, at *7 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2026).  The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff, note the mailing on the docket, and close the case. ORDER ENCLOSED.  Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 3/10/2026.  (SEW)","entry_number":"11"}],"49504":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69823097/10/miao-v-noem/","date":"2025-07-17","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth, the Court finds this complaint moot. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.  Ordered by Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 7/17/2025.  (ENE)","entry_number":"10"}],"49503":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69823095/8/zhang-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2025-06-16","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that this action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Decker v. Nw. Envtl. Def. Ctr., 568 U.S. 597, 609 (2013). Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 6/16/2025. (JP) (Entered: 06/16/2025)","entry_number":"8"}],"69626":[{"date":"2025-07-15","role":"ending","text":"ORDER re: 64 . Plaintiffs' letter is deemed to constitute their notice of voluntary dismissal as to the remaining claims as moot. Final Judgment pursuant to the Court's Order granting summary judgment as to plaintiffs under the APA will be entered under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). It is further ORDERED that the Government shall file a letter in response to plaintiffs' letter by 7/18/2025. A conference is set for 7/22/2025 at 10:00 am in Courtroom 10A South before Judge Brian M. Cogan. If the Government's letter adequately addresses the issues raised in plaintiffs' letter, the Court will consider adjourning the conference sine die. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/15/2025. (PW)"}],"49464":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69727502/12/azam-v-noem/","date":"2025-12-01","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants; the Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 6, is granted and this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 12/1/2025. (JP) (Entered: 12/01/2025)","entry_number":"12"}],"50943":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69689862/21/fan-v-us-citizenship-and-immigration-services-uscis/","date":"2026-09-25","role":"ending","text":"ORDER granting  16   Motion to Dismiss. Defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs [name] claim is dismissed WITHOUT PRJEUDICE and his mandamus claim is  dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. Please see attached for further details. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close this case. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 9/25/2026.  (EJK)","entry_number":"21"}],"49386":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69631823/7/zhang-v-noem/","date":"2025-03-26","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Stipulation of Dismissal 6 is So Ordered. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 3/26/2025. (MAA) (Entered: 03/26/2025)","entry_number":"7"}],"49372":[{"date":"2025-06-04","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The parties' stipulation of dismissal with prejudice 20 is so-ordered. This action is hereby dismissed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this action. So Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 6/4/2025. (RCC)"}],"49359":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69614059/8/rehman-v-us-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2025-05-15","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; and the defendant's request for a pre-motion conference, ECF No. 7, is denied as moot. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Ryan Richards, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 5/15/2025. (ROLR) (Entered: 05/15/2025)","entry_number":"8"}],"50933":[{"date":"2025-03-25","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: In light of the parties' stipulation of dismissal, 8, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 3/25/2025. (RAL)"}],"50932":[{"date":"2025-03-28","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 11 Stipulation of Dismissal, filed by Kristi Noem, [name], U.S. Attorney's Office, Jennifer B. Higgins, Benjamine C. Huffman, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), New York Asylum Office, USCIS. The stipulation of dismissal is So Ordered. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 3/28/2025. (LP)"}],"50930":[{"date":"2025-05-06","role":"ending","text":"Electronic ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 8 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Laura Zuchowski, James McHenry, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Jennifer Higgins. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), by stipulation of the parties, this matter is dismissed without prejudice. See DE 8 . The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Civil case terminated. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 5/6/2025. (KDW)"}],"49330":[{"date":"2025-03-27","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: Stipulation of Dismissal 8 is so ordered. Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 3/27/2025. (SAD) Modified on 3/27/2025 (TPL)."}],"49310":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69544639/24/sarkisova-v-miller/","date":"2026-02-01","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Order, Defendant's motion is GRANTED, see ECF No.  15 , Plaintiff's motion is DENIED, see ECF No.  17 , and the case is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment consistent with this Order and to close this case.  Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 2/1/2026.  (GEM)","entry_number":"24"}],"49303":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69587947/10/zhao-v-uscis-office-of-the-general-counsel/","date":"2025-05-09","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that this case is dismissed as moot. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 5/9/2025. (JP) (Entered: 05/09/2025)","entry_number":"10"}],"49245":[{"date":"2025-02-19","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The parties' 5 stipulation of dismissal is so ordered and this action is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is respectfully directed to enter a judgment consistent with 5 stipulation of dismissal. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 2/19/2025. (AH)"}],"49238":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69513148/18/biobaku-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-service/","date":"2026-09-29","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: For the reasons set out in the enclosed order, defendants' motion to dismiss  12  is granted.  Plaintiff's claims under 8 U.S.C.  § 1421(c), the APA, the Fifth Amendment, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Declaration of Independenc e are dismissed with prejudice, as amendment would be futile.  See Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000).  Plaintiff's undue delay claim is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.  The Clerk is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close this case.   ORDER ENCLOSED.  Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 9/29/2026.  (JAP)","entry_number":"18"}],"49173":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69450975/10/papkov-v-jaddou/","date":"2025-03-28","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The STIPULATION of Dismissal 9 has been granted. So Ordered by Judge Edward R. Korman on 3/28/2025. (IH) (Entered: 03/28/2025)","entry_number":"10"}],"49132":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69411694/35/lin-v-garland/","date":"2026-03-25","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants Defendants motion to dismiss and denies Plaintiffs motion for sanctions. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/25/2026.  (OA)","entry_number":"35"}],"49044":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69351196/6/lu-v-mayorkas/","date":"2025-01-08","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The Stipulation of Dismissal 5 is SO-Ordered. Ordered by Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 1/8/2025. (ENE) (Entered: 01/08/2025)","entry_number":"6"}],"48956":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69301788/11/edwards-v-garland/","date":"2025-09-16","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.  Ordered by Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 9/16/2025.  (ENE)","entry_number":"11"}],"48954":[{"date":"2024-12-09","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. See ECF No. 7 . The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this order to pro se Plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 12/9/2024. (KM)"}],"48946":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69276002/14/liu-v-mayorkas/","date":"2025-06-18","role":"ending","text":"ORDER granting  13  Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue. For the reasons set forth in the attached Opinion & Order, Defendants' motion is granted and I order this case transferred to the Southern District of Ohio. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 6/18/2025. (KCC)","entry_number":"14"}],"48821":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69184441/13/islam-v-dibbins/","date":"2025-07-01","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 12 Stipulation of Dismissal: the application has been granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 7/1/2025. (DLMP) (Entered: 07/01/2025)","entry_number":"13"}],"48708":[{"date":"2024-10-24","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal. See ECF No. 5 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 10/24/2024. (PN)"}],"48642":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69041260/42/taneja-v-miller/","date":"2026-06-16","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM & ORDER : For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants Defendants motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 33) and denies Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 38). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment for Defendants and close the case. Ordered by Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 6/15/2026.  (MAA)","entry_number":"42"}],"50860":[{"date":"2024-09-24","role":"ending","text":"ORDER re 8 : The Notice of Voluntary Dismissal is approved. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter closed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 9/24/2024. c/ecf (RI)"}],"48522":[{"date":"2024-09-30","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 7 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Ur M. Jaddou: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to the above captioned action, that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. Ordered by Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 9/30/2024. (MV)"}],"48505":[{"date":"2024-09-30","role":"ending","text":"ORDER. The stipulation of dismissal at ECF No. 9 is so-ordered. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 9/30/2024. (JR)"}],"48494":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68959895/8/zhang-v-us-department-of-homeland-security/","date":"2024-08-21","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE plaintiff's Voluntary dismissal without prejudice. ( Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 8/21/2024 ) (RG) (Entered: 08/21/2024)","entry_number":"8"}],"48199":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68825322/8/liu-v-jaddou/","date":"2024-12-17","role":"ending","text":"Order: Since the plaintiff's claim is moot, the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction. The defendants' motion to dismiss is granted and the plaintiffs motion for a writ of mandamus is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Cour t is respectfully directed to close this case and enter judgment. The Clerk is also respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to theplaintiff at the address she provided and note the mailing on the docket.   Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 12/17/2024.  (DG)","entry_number":"8"}],"50826":[{"date":"2024-06-21","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) in light of the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal (ECF No. 8 ), because Defendants have neither filed an answer nor a motion for summary judgment. Case closed. Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 6/21/2024. (ASB)"}],"50823":[{"date":"2024-06-17","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE The case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) in light of the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal (ECF No. 6 ), because Defendants have neither filed an answer nor a motion for summary judgment. Case closed. Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 6/17/2024. (DE)"}],"48164":[{"date":"2024-12-18","role":"ending","text":"ELECTRONIC ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 13 Stipulation of Dismissal without prejudice filed by Ur M. Jaddou: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to the above captioned action, that this action shall be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l)(A)(ii), with each patty to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. Ordered by Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 12/18/2024. (MV)"}],"50810":[{"date":"2024-06-06","role":"ending","text":"Electronic ORDER DISMISSING CASE, Civil Case Terminated. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), because the parties have stipulated to dismissal, Plaintiffs may voluntarily dismiss the case without prejudice without a Court Order. See DE 7, Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. Civil case terminated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. (AGB)"}],"48074":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68476246/23/jiang-v-garland/","date":"2025-05-27","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: For the reasons provided in the attached Order, Defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF No.  19 , is granted and the Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment consistent with this Order and to close this case.  Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 5/27/2025.  (RCM)","entry_number":"23"}],"48045":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68461235/10/singh-v-citizenship-and-immigration-services-usciset-al/","date":"2025-03-31","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum and order, Defendants' motion to dismiss  8  for failure to state a claim is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close the case. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 3/31/2025. (SCI)","entry_number":"10"}],"50799":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68435447/39/sl-v-united-states-citizenship-immigration-services-uscis/","date":"2025-10-20","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted; and Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice to refile. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 10/20/2025. (JP) (Entered: 10/20/2025)","entry_number":"39"}],"47957":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68420053/22/rahman-v-garland/","date":"2025-07-14","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, Defendants'  17  motion to dismiss is granted. This action is hereby dismissed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and to close this action. Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 7/14/2025.  (RCC)","entry_number":"22"}],"47917":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68408239/20/adebayo-v-united-states-department-of-state/","date":"2025-03-31","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum and order, Defendants' motion to dismiss  17  for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close the case. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 3/31/2025. (SCI)","entry_number":"20"}],"47882":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68416021/11/chu-v-mayorkas/","date":"2025-10-27","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth, the Court finds this matter is moot, and that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 10/27/2025.  (ENE)","entry_number":"11"}],"47874":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68384793/13/lin-v-garland/","date":"2025-01-22","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted. While leave to amend is generally freely given, see Cruz v. Gomez, 202 F.3d 593, 597-98 (2d Cir. 2000), leave to amend is not warranted \"where it is  clear from the face of the complaint that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction or that a claim cannot be stated as a matter of law.\" Steele v. Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 14-cv-7104 (ENV)(MDG), 2016 WL 4688850, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2016). T hat is the case here. Leave to amend is denied. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis st atus is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint, mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff, and note the mailing on the docket.  Ordered by Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 1/23/2025.  (ENE)","entry_number":"13"}],"47744":[{"date":"2024-04-24","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: In light of the parties' stipulation of dismissal 12, the above case caption is hereby closed. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 4/24/2024. (MEG)"}],"47713":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68297924/10/zhang-v-garland/","date":"2024-04-10","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice 9 is SO-ordered. Ordered by District Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 4/10/2024. (ENE) (Entered: 04/10/2024)","entry_number":"10"}],"47685":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68282154/31/lin-v-mayorkas/","date":"2025-07-08","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted; and that this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 7/8/2025. (JP) (Entered: 07/08/2025)","entry_number":"31"}],"50765":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68273554/20/ci-v-us-citizenship-and-immigration-services-uscis/","date":"2025-06-06","role":"ending","text":"ORDER:  For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Order, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' motion to dismiss and dismisses Plaintiff's complaint in full. See ECF No.  14 . Although the dismissal is with prejudice--meaning the C ourt will not permit Plaintiff to amend his complaint to make another attempt to assert his claims, this decision does not preclude Plaintiff from bringing a new lawsuit in the future pursuant to the APA, should Defendants continue to delay in adjudicating his application to a point at which the delay becomes unreasonable. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and to close this case.  Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 6/6/2025.  (DF)","entry_number":"20"}],"47652":[{"date":"2024-03-29","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: In light of the parties' stipulation of dismissal 8, the above case caption is hereby closed. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 3/29/2024. (AL)"}],"47635":[{"date":"2024-04-30","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: As stated in plaintiffs' Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 7 filed on April 27, 2024, the claims in this action against defendants are voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 4/30/2024. (APJ)"}],"47526":[{"date":"2024-03-04","role":"ending","text":"ORDER. In view of the stipulation of dismissal at ECF No. 8, the Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close the case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 3/4/2024. (JR)"}],"47514":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68176919/26/xia-v-garland/","date":"2024-08-23","role":"ending","text":"ORDER granting  23   Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case.  Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 8/23/2024.  (AL)","entry_number":"26"}],"47450":[{"date":"2024-03-19","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The parties' stipulation of dismissal 8 without prejudice is so ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 3/19/2024. (GM)"}],"47443":[{"date":"2024-02-15","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: The parties' stipulation of dismissal is so ordered. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs, fees, and expenses. So Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 2/15/2024. (MM)"}],"68312":[{"date":"2024-08-14","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: Pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal at DE 12, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 8/14/2024. (MO)"}],"47407":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68096110/18/dong-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-07-22","role":"ending","text":"ORDER granting  13   Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. For the reasons explained in the attached opinion, I grant defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.  Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 7/22/2024.  (GEC)","entry_number":"18"}],"50724":[{"date":"2024-03-12","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) in light of Plaintiffs' Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, ECF No. 10, because Defendant has neither filed an answer nor a motion for summary judgment. Case closed. Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 3/12/2024. (DE)"}],"47259":[{"date":"2024-01-25","role":"ending","text":"ORDER finding as moot 13 Motion to Withdraw 13 MOTION to Withdraw filed In light of the so ordered stipulation of dismissal 12, this motion to withdraw is denied as moot. Ordered by District Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 1/25/2024. (Reyes, Ramon)"}],"47231":[{"date":"2023-12-29","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 6 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 12/29/2023. (RS)"}],"47190":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67936146/8/you-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-01-16","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice 7 is SO-ordered. Ordered by District Judge Ramón E. Reyes, Jr. on 1/16/2024. (ENE) (Entered: 01/16/2024)","entry_number":"8"}],"47166":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67920987/23/coulibaly-v-schrader/","date":"2025-09-22","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss.   Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 9/22/2025.   (RLS)","entry_number":"23"}],"47158":[{"date":"2023-11-13","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal. See ECF No. 5 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 11/13/2023. (BH)"}],"47145":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67918848/13/chay-poz-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-09-26","role":"ending","text":"ORDER  GRANTING   7   Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim AND  7   Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Defendants' motion to dismiss this action is granted without prejudice.  The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.  SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 9/26/2024.  (Irizarry, Dora)","entry_number":"13"}],"47119":[{"date":"2023-11-30","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The parties' 7 stipulation of dismissal is so ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 11/30/2023. (CS)"}],"47107":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67891268/19/yang-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-10-23","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: For the reasons explained in the attached memorandum and order, this case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 10/23/2024. (BRS)","entry_number":"19"}],"46945":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67802559/19/fang-v-cioppa/","date":"2025-01-23","role":"ending","text":"ORDER GRANTING  15 : For the reasons stated in the attached Order, Defendant's motion to dismiss  15  is GRANTED.  The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this action. Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 1/23/2025.  (RCC)","entry_number":"19"}],"46927":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67792258/17/ullah-v-schrader/","date":"2024-09-16","role":"ending","text":"ORDER granting  8   Motion to Dismiss -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is granted for lack of subject matter jurisdiction leave to amend the complaint is denied as futile and this action is dismissed.  The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment on behalf of Defendants and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 9/16/2024.  (Irizarry, Dora)","entry_number":"17"}],"46880":[{"date":"2025-05-16","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: On April 11, 2025, Defendants filed a letter informing the Court that an interview notice was issued to Plaintiff and requesting that this case be dismissed as moot. Plaintiff was directed to file a letter on or before May 5, 2025 explaining why the case should not be dismissed. To date, Plaintiff has not done so. A case is considered moot \"when it is impossible for a court to grant any effectual relief whatever to the prevailing party.\" Knox v. Serv. Emps. Intl Union, Local 1000, 567 U.S. 298, 307 (2012). \"In the immigration context, an 'agency's refusal to act' on an application for adjustment of status is a 'prerequisite for the existence of a case or controversy.'\" Yusupov v. Mayorkas, 21-CV-4066, 2021 WL 6105720, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2021) (quoting Meixian Ye v. Kelly, 17-CV-3010, 2017 WL 2804932, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. June 28, 2017)). \"[C]ourts in this district have found that the issuance of an interview notice renders a suit to compel adjudication of an immigration application moot.\" Long v. Garland, 22-CV-6652, 2023 WL 6930674, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 19, 2023) (citation omitted). Here, USCIS has acted on plaintiff's application by scheduling an interview, rendering this action moot. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case and to mail a copy of this order to plaintiff, noting such mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 5/16/2025. (EDH)"}],"46788":[{"date":"2023-10-19","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal. See ECF No. 9 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 10/19/2023. (BH)"}],"46649":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67614499/7/zhuo-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-09-26","role":"ending","text":"ORDER GRANTING  6  Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Defendants' motion to dismiss this action is granted in its entirety.  The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.  SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 9/26/2024.  (Irizarry, Dora)","entry_number":"7"}],"46645":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67611483/11/he-v-garland/","date":"2024-08-07","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM & ORDER:  For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is granted  8 . Order attached. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case. Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 8/7/2024. (CFB)","entry_number":"11"}],"46632":[{"date":"2026-02-04","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: The Court construes the 7 withdrawal of claim as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The 7 withdrawal of claim is so-ordered. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 2/4/2026. (JAG)"}],"46629":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67603881/15/salim-v-garland/","date":"2024-09-16","role":"ending","text":"ORDER granting  9   Motion to Dismiss --  For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, leave to amend the complaint is denied as futile, and this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.  The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close this case.  SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 9/16/2024.  (Irizarry, Dora)","entry_number":"15"}],"46591":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67560554/20/sharifi-v-blinken/","date":"2024-04-25","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: See attached.  The Court denies the Government's motion to dismiss claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), and the Government's motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is granted without prejudice.  Accordingly, this action is dismissed in entirety without prejudice.  The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter a judgment in accordance with this order.  Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 4/25/2024.  (MM)","entry_number":"20"}],"46586":[{"date":"2023-08-22","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 7 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 8/22/2023. (AKC)"}],"46449":[{"date":"2023-10-05","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE as per Stipulation of Dismissal at Docket Entry No. 18 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 10/5/2023. (JN)"}],"46446":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67481729/13/singh-v-mayorkas/","date":"2023-11-30","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE dated 11/29/23 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) without prejudice. ( Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 11/29/2023 ) (RG) (Entered: 11/30/2023)","entry_number":"13"}],"50643":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67361642/24/marquez-v-garland/","date":"2026-02-18","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Opinion and Order, Defendants' Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted as to the APA claims but denied with respect to the due process claims . (ECF No.  17 .) Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the Fifth Amendment procedural due process and substantive due process claims for failure to state a claim is granted in its entirety. (Id.) Defendants' Rule 56 motion for  summary judgment on the APA claims and Plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment are dismissed as moot. (Id; ECF No.  15 .)  All claims set forth in the Complaint are dismissed with prejudice with the sole exception of the substant ive due process claims, which are dismissed without prejudice. The parties shall meet and confer as to whether Plaintiffs seek leave to amend the Complaint under Rule 15(a)(2) to address only the substantive due process claims on a rational b asis theory and, if so, whether Defendants oppose. The parties must file a letter on the docket informing the Court whether Plaintiffs seek leave to amend the Complaint, and whether Defendants will oppose, by March 4, 2026. Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 2/18/2026.  (MMC)","entry_number":"24"}],"46288":[{"date":"2023-06-14","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE as per Stipulation of Dismissal filed at docket entry No. 8 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on June 14, 2023. (PN)"}],"50642":[{"date":"2023-11-03","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The parties' 9 stipulation of dismissal without prejudice is so ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 11/3/2023. (CS)"}],"50640":[{"date":"2024-03-26","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 14 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 3/26/2024. (AD)"}],"46229":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67278092/15/tu-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-05-10","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum & Order, the Court grants  11  Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. The Court respectfully requests that the Clerk of Court enter judgment. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 5/10/2024.  (MLB)","entry_number":"15"}],"46191":[{"date":"2023-07-19","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 7 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. [name] on 7/19/2023. (KW)"}],"46178":[{"date":"2023-06-27","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE as per Stipulation of Dismissal filed at Docket Entry No. 8 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 6/27/2023. (JN)"}],"45977":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68956574/40/mason-v-uscis/","date":"2025-08-25","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:  Because the Court lacks the authority to grant [name] relief from the denial of his naturalization application while removal proceedings are pending against him, Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile his petition for review of the denial of his naturalization application after removal proceedings have concluded. Ordered by Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 8/25/2025.  (ENE)","entry_number":"40"}],"46131":[{"date":"2023-05-23","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 8 stipulation of dismissal without prejudice is so-ordered. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 5/23/2023. (SDC)"}],"46048":[{"date":"2023-06-05","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal. See ECF No. 7 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 6/5/2023. (BH)"}],"46043":[{"date":"2023-06-05","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: The 7 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 6/5/2023. (LK)"}],"45958":[{"date":"2023-06-23","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: In light of the parties' joint stipulation of dismissal 7, notifying the Court that Plaintiff is voluntarily dismissing this case against the Defendants without prejudice, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 6/23/2023. (CG)"}],"45956":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67124369/12/mu-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2023-07-22","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying order, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss and dismisses Plaintiff's complaint in full.  See ECF No.  8 .  The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment, to close this case, and to mail a copy of this order and the forthcoming judgment to the pro se Plaintiff.  Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 7/22/2023.  (BH)","entry_number":"12"}],"45935":[{"date":"2023-04-18","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the terms of the parties' 7 stipulation of dismissal. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 4/18/2023. (BC)"}],"45820":[{"date":"2023-05-05","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal. See ECF No. 8 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 5/5/2023. (BH)"}],"45788":[{"date":"2023-05-04","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Please see the 5 stipulation of dismissal. This case is dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 5/4/23. (NCM)"}],"50618":[{"date":"2023-05-09","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE as per Stipulation of Dismissal filed at Docket Entry No. 9 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 5/9/2023. (JN)"}],"45764":[{"date":"2023-04-19","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal. See ECF No. 9 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 4/19/2023. (BH)"}],"50616":[{"date":"2023-06-26","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 7 stipulation of dismissal is so-ordered. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 6/26/2023. (Miyamoto, Matthew)"}],"45755":[{"date":"2023-04-24","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: The 7 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 4/24/2023. (LK)"}],"45750":[{"date":"2023-04-17","role":"ending","text":"Order dismissing case. The Stipulation of Dismissal at 7 is so ordered. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 4/17/2023. (JL)"}],"45739":[{"date":"2023-03-27","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Please see the 8 stipulation of dismissal. This action is dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 3/27/23. (NCM)"}],"45738":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66818714/8/weng-v-menges/","date":"2024-02-07","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The Stipulation of Dismissal 7 Without Prejudice has been granted. So ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 2/7/2024. (JP) (Entered: 02/08/2024)","entry_number":"8"}],"45705":[{"date":"2024-01-26","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The parties' stipulation of dismissal 19 is so ordered. This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice and with leave to re-open the case on motion within 30 days of the final agency decision of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (\"MSPB\") Docket Number NY-0752-24-0078-I-1 as to Plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 1/26/2024. (MM)"}],"45700":[{"date":"2025-11-13","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: In light of Plaintiffs' notice of voluntary dismissal 12, made pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 11/13/2025. (CG)"}],"45697":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66819759/17/liu-v-garland/","date":"2024-06-11","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum & Order, the Court grants Defendants'  12  Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment and terminate this matter.  Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 6/11/2024.  (HMM)","entry_number":"17"}],"45689":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66818362/17/luo-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-service/","date":"2023-09-01","role":"ending","text":"ORDER.  For the reasons set forth in the accompanying order, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss, ECF No.  7 , and dismisses Plaintiff's complaint.The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment, to close this case, and to mail a copy of this order and the forthcoming judgment to the pro se Plaintiff.  Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 9/1/2023.  (JN)","entry_number":"17"}],"45687":[{"date":"2023-03-21","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 7 stipulation of dismissal without prejudice is so-ordered. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 3/21/2023. (SDC)"}],"45654":[{"date":"2023-03-21","role":"ending","text":"Civil Case Terminated as per parties' Rule 41(a) stipulation. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/21/2023. (Cogan, Brian)"}],"45567":[{"date":"2023-03-07","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: The 7 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered.Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 3/7/2023. (LK)"}],"45510":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66735149/8/ni-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-02-07","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The STIPULATION of Dismissal 7 has been granted. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 2/7/2024. (IH) (Entered: 02/08/2024)","entry_number":"8"}],"45468":[{"date":"2023-03-20","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE as per Stipulation of Dismissal filed at docket entry No. 7 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 3/20/2023. (JN)"}],"45464":[{"date":"2023-02-20","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Please see the 7 stipulation of dismissal. This case is dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 2/20/23. (NCM)"}],"50605":[{"date":"2023-02-17","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 11 . The stipulation of dismissal is so ordered. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 2/17/2023. (LP)"}],"50599":[{"date":"2024-07-02","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) in light of the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal (ECF No. 23 ), because Defendants have neither filed an answer nor a motion for summary judgment. Case closed. Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 7/2/2024. (DE)"}],"45129":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65735565/8/diakite-v-menges/","date":"2022-12-22","role":"ending","text":"Order(Other) AND Order on Motion to Change Venue AND Case Transferred Out - District Transfer","entry_number":"8"}],"45096":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65665151/11/long-v-garland/","date":"2023-10-19","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ORDER ATTACHED. Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 10/19/2023. (copy mailed).   (AG)","entry_number":"11"}],"44997":[{"date":"2022-12-15","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice. So Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 12/15/2022. (RS)"}],"44942":[{"date":"2023-02-14","role":"ending","text":"ORDER re 8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by [name] -- The Court construes pro se Plaintiff's last filing 8 to be a notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and, pursuant to that rule, respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to mark this action closed. Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 2/14/2023. (copy mailed). (AG)"}],"44937":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65417484/8/chen-v-mayorkas/","date":"2022-12-06","role":"remand","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT that Plaintiffs Petition for Naturalization Hearing and all claims therein are hereby remanded to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys fees to any part; that this remand is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-400) within thirty (30) days of this Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court; and that if Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between thirty-one (31) and sixty (60) days from the date this Stipulation and Order of Remand is so-ordered, this action shall be deemed dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Brenna B. Mahoney, Clerk of Court on 12/6/2022. (IH) (Entered: 12/07/2022)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":30,"quote":"that this remand is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-400) within thirty (30) days of this Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court;","measured_from":"this Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court"},"if_not_reinstated":{"quote":"and that if Plaintiff fails to reinstate this action between thirty-one (31) and sixty (60) days from the date this Stipulation and Order of Remand is so-ordered, this action shall be deemed dismissed with prejudice.","result":"dismissed_with_prejudice"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"that this remand is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-400) within thirty (30) days of this Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court;","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"}},"entry_number":"8"}],"44736":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65213253/21/ngai-v-mayorkas/","date":"2024-03-29","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is granted; and that Defendants' motion to withdraw is denied as moot. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 3/29/2024. (JP) (Entered: 04/01/2024)","entry_number":"21"}],"44689":[{"date":"2022-10-06","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE -- Per the 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal filed on October 5, 2022, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 10/6/2022. (KA)"}],"44648":[{"date":"2022-10-04","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Reference is made to plaintiff's 7 notice of voluntary dismissal. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the case is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 10/4/22. (NCM)"}],"44471":[{"date":"2022-09-14","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE -- As stipulated and agreed by and between the parties in the 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal filed on September 12, 2022, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 9/14/2022. (Harris-Dyer, Sophia)"}],"44405":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63601206/6/lin-v-garland/","date":"2022-07-21","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal 5 has been granted. Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 7/21/2022. (Herrera, Isaiah) (Entered: 07/21/2022)","entry_number":"6"}],"44246":[{"date":"2022-08-30","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE as per Stipulation of Dismissal filed at docket entry No. 7 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on August 30, 2022. (Neptune, Pierre)"}],"44191":[{"date":"2022-08-11","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE as per Stipulation of Dismissal filed at docket entry No. 8 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 8/11/2022. (Nkodo, Julie-Irene)"}],"44143":[{"date":"2022-08-15","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE -- As stipulated and agreed by and between the parties in the 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal filed on August 12, 2022, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 8/15/2022. (Almonte, Kelly)"}],"44021":[{"date":"2022-07-08","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE -- As stipulated and agreed by and between the parties in the 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal filed on July 8, 2022, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 7/8/2022. (Almonte, Kelly)"}],"44011":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63297725/19/nurjahan-v-united-states-department-of-state/","date":"2023-04-13","role":"ending","text":"ORDER granting  13  Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth in the attached Opinion and Order, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 4/13/2023. (NH)","entry_number":"19"}],"43875":[{"date":"2022-06-17","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Please see the stipulation of dismissal 7 . The case is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 6/17/2022. (Daus, Benjamin)"}],"50566":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63215194/11/cabrera-benscome-v-garland/","date":"2022-05-17","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to the above-captioned action, that 1. Plaintiffs Complaint and all claims therein are hereby dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, without costs or attorneys fees to any party, subject to the provisions of paragraph 2 herein. 2. This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate this action if United States Citizenship and Immigration Services does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-400) within thirty (30) days of entry of judgment. 3.The Clerk of the Court shall enter a judgment in accordance with this Stipulation and Order of Dismissal. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 5/16/2022. (Yu, Stephanie) (Entered: 05/17/2022)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":30,"quote":"This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate this action if United States Citizenship and Immigration Services does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-400) within thirty (30) days of entry of judgment.","measured_from":"entry of judgment"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to reinstate this action if United States Citizenship and Immigration Services does not render a decision on Plaintiffs application for naturalization (Form N-400) within thirty (30) days of entry of judgment.","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"}},"entry_number":"11"}],"43802":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63197150/10/cao-v-mayorkas/","date":"2022-08-04","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The STIPULATION of Dismissal 9 has been granted. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 8/4/2022. (Herrera, Isaiah) (Entered: 08/04/2022)","entry_number":"10"}],"50563":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63162376/9/sandhu-v-garland/","date":"2022-05-20","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: 8 Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice, Executed by the Parties and Submitted for the Court's Endorsement is SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 5/20/2022. (Florio, Lisa) (Entered: 05/20/2022)","entry_number":"9"}],"43756":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63175008/27/duan-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2023-07-22","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying order, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss and dismisses Plaintiff's complaint in full.  See ECF No.  24 .  The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment, to close this case, and to mail a copy of this order and the forthcoming judgment to the pro se Plaintiff.  Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 7/22/2023.  (BH)","entry_number":"27"}],"43721":[{"date":"2022-04-29","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE -- Plaintiff filed this action to compel United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (\"USCIS\") to adjudicate Plaintiffs [name] applications for adjustment of status. Because USCIS has since approved those applications, Plaintiffs claims are moot. Martin-Trigona v. Shiff, 702 F.2d 380, 386 (2d Cir. 1983) (\"The hallmark of a moot case or controversy is that the relief sought can no longer be given or is no longer needed.\"). This case is therefore dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close the case. Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 4/29/2022. c/m. (Guy, Alicia)"}],"43666":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63118256/62/alhariri-v-blinken/","date":"2025-05-19","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM & ORDER, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Because Plaintiffs have not requested leave to amend, such dismissal is WITH PREJUDICE. So   Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 5/19/2025.  (TLH)","entry_number":"62"}],"43625":[{"date":"2022-04-26","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The stipulation of dismissal at 7 is so-ordered. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 4/26/2022. (Andrews, Stephen)"}],"43604":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/62984511/9/sharma-v-garland/","date":"2022-04-01","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT that Plaintiff's Complaint and all claims therein are dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, without costs or attorneys' fees to any party; and that this dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if United States Citizenship and Immigration Services does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-400) within thirty (30) days of entry of judgment. Signed Brenna B. Mahoney, Clerk of Court by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on 4/1/2022. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 04/01/2022)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":30,"quote":"and that this dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if United States Citizenship and Immigration Services does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-400) within thirty (30) days of entry of judgment.","measured_from":"entry of judgment"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"and that this dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if United States Citizenship and Immigration Services does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-400) within thirty (30) days of entry of judgment.","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"}},"entry_number":"9"}],"43409":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/61602545/32/makinano-v-jaddou/","date":"2023-02-02","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER.  Since the plaintiff's claim is moot, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. The defendants' motion to dismiss is granted and the plaintiff's motion for a writ of mandamus is dismissed without preju dice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case and enter judgment. The Clerk is also respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff at the address he provided and note the mailing on the docket.  Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 2/2/2023.  (DG)","entry_number":"32"}],"43302":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60936823/23/chirico-v-mendoza-jaddou/","date":"2023-03-13","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached document, defendants'  17  motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) is granted, and plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment is denied.  Plaintiffs ma y file a motion seeking leave to file a second amended complaint within thirty days.  Any such motion should include the proposed second amended complaint as an exhibit and explain why leave to amend should be granted.  If plaintiffs do not seek leave to amend within thirty days, judgment shall be entered and the case closed.  Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 3/13/2023.  (Miyamoto, Matthew)","entry_number":"23"}],"43272":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60697689/21/napoleon-v-jaddou/","date":"2023-08-17","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM & ORDER -- For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum & Order, Respondents' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 18-1, is GRANTED and the Petition, ECF No. 1, is dismissed without prejudice.  The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close the case.  SEE ATTACHED ORDER.   Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 8/17/2023.  (KA)","entry_number":"21"}],"43256":[{"date":"2021-12-10","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Please refer to the stipulation of dismissal at 6 . The case is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 12/10/2021. (Bell, Jason)"}],"42959":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60105397/11/li-v-united-states-of-america/","date":"2021-10-12","role":"ending","text":"STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE -- As stipulated and agreed between the parties, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 10/12/2021. (Almonte, Kelly) (Entered: 10/12/2021)","entry_number":"11"}],"42947":[{"date":"2021-09-08","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 8 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. No judgment need be entered. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/8/2021. (Nguyen, Andrew)"}],"42924":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60071093/9/yusupov-v-mayorkas/","date":"2021-12-23","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ORDER ATTACHED. Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 12/23/2021. (Zabel, Joseph)","entry_number":"9"}],"42919":[{"date":"2021-08-23","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 7 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. No judgment need be entered. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/23/2021. (Nguyen, Andrew)"}],"42782":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59956030/35/rodriguez-v-mayorkas/","date":"2023-02-01","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Defendants' motion is granted; that Plaintiff's claims with respect to the denial of his application for a waiver of inadmissibility are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and that Plaintiff's claims with respect to the denial of his U Visa petition are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed by Brenna B. Mahoney, Clerk of Court by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on 1/31/23. (FP) (Entered: 02/01/2023)","entry_number":"35"}],"42524":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59700321/12/bobb-v-uscis-at-the-department-of-homeland-security/","date":"2021-04-21","role":"ending","text":"CLERK'S JUDGMENT : ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Complaint and all claims therein are dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, without costs or attorneys' fees to any party; and that this dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if United States Citizenship and Immigration Services does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-400) within thirty (30) days of entry of judgment. Ordered by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on behalf of Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of Court on 4/20/2021. (Tavarez, Jennifer) (Entered: 04/21/2021)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":30,"quote":"and that this dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if United States Citizenship and Immigration Services does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-400) within thirty (30) days of entry of judgment.","measured_from":"entry of judgment"},"if_agency_does_not_act":{"quote":"and that this dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if United States Citizenship and Immigration Services does not render a decision on Plaintiff's application for naturalization (Form N-400) within thirty (30) days of entry of judgment.","plaintiff_may":"reinstate"}},"entry_number":"12"}],"42475":[{"date":"2021-03-12","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The 7 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. No judgment need be entered. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 3/12/2021. (Larson, Emma)"}],"42455":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/30939835/7/liu-v-bowes/","date":"2021-02-10","role":"ending","text":"ORDER: As per 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. So Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 2/10/2021. (Almonte, Giselle) (Entered: 02/11/2021)","entry_number":"7"}]}}