{"schema":"passim-mandamus-docket-endings.v1","run":"site-20261103T071210Z-26ffd2","court":"ncmd","count":6,"endings":{"37055":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70330373/14/salami-v-noam/","date":"2025-11-20","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 11/20/2025;  that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc.  10 ) is GRANTED and Plaintiff [name]'s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (sh)","entry_number":"14"}],"37040":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69125377/20/green-arrow-labs-inc-v-mayorkas/","date":"2026-03-23","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the Court  GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF  17 ], DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE   [name]'s Complaint [ECF  1 ], and DISMISSES the matter. Signed by CHIEF  DISTRICT JUDGE FRANK W. VOLK on 03/23/2026.  (at)","entry_number":"20"}],"37015":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67998226/11/aslam-v-heller/","date":"2024-07-23","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 7/23/2024; that the instant Motion (Docket Entry  5 ) be granted, and that the Complaint (Docket Entry  1 ) be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (sh)","entry_number":"11"}],"37014":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67917927/21/farahani-v-rubio/","date":"2025-01-31","role":"ending","text":"JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 1/31/2025; that Defendants' motion for reconsideration (Doc. 13 ) is GRANTED and the court's May 30, 2024 memorandum opinion and order (Doc. 11 ) is VACATED. FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 6 ) is GRANTED and Dr. [name]'s complaint (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (sh) (Entered: 01/31/2025)","entry_number":"21"}],"37005":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67672361/43/sarhan-v-united-states-citizens-immigration-services/","date":"2024-03-26","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 03/26/2024,  that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc.  30 )  is GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; FURTHER ORDERED that   Dr. [name]'s motions for preliminary relief (Doc.  22 ,  34 ), motion to  disqualify the magistrate judge (Doc.  39 ), and objections to the magistrate judge's memorandum order and recommendation (Docs.  38 ,  41 ) are  all DENIED as MOOT. (at)","entry_number":"43"}],"36981":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63381742/13/rivas-dubon-v-jaddou/","date":"2022-11-15","role":"ending","text":"MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 11/15/2022, that USCIS's Motion to Remand, (ECF No.  5 ), is GRANTED. The Court remands this action to USCIS for adjudication of Plaintiff's application for naturalization. USCIS is instructed to adjudicate Plaintiff's application within fifteen (15) days of this Order.(Taylor, Abby)","terms":{"agency_deadline":{"days":15,"quote":"USCIS is instructed to adjudicate Plaintiff's application within fifteen (15) days of this Order.(Taylor, Abby)","measured_from":"this Order"}},"entry_number":"13"}]}}