{"schema":"passim-mandamus-docket-endings.v1","run":"site-20261103T071210Z-26ffd2","court":"insd","count":5,"endings":{"30481":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71661017/13/ogunyale-v-edlow/","date":"2026-09-08","role":"ending","text":"ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS -  Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED. Dkt.  10  This matter shall be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Final judgment shall issue accordingly.  SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/8/2026.  (KAA)","entry_number":"13"}],"30470":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70275015/14/berde-v-us-citizenship-and-immigration-services/","date":"2026-04-15","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AS MOOT - The Court ordered [name] to show cause by April 7, 2026, as to why the Court should not dismiss this action as moot (Dkt. 13 ). The deadline has passed, and [name] has failed to respond to the Show Cause Order. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action as moot. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10 ) is likewise DENIED as moot. Final judgment consistent with this Entry will issue under separate order. (SEE ORDER.) Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/15/2026. (TPS) (Entered: 04/15/2026)","entry_number":"14"}],"30469":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70246311/18/taklit-v-bondi/","date":"2026-03-30","role":"ending","text":"ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS - Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing No.  9 ) is  GRANTED. Plaintiffs' ADA claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter  jurisdiction, and Plaintiffs' mandamus claim is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a  claim upon which relief can be granted. Final judgment will issue under separate entry. (See Order.) Signed by District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/30/2026.   (JSR)","entry_number":"18"}],"30529":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69831431/23/kaur-atif-v-noem/","date":"2026-02-11","role":"ending","text":"ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AS MOOT - The Court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause by February 2, 2026, as to why the Court should not dismiss this action as moot (Filing No. 21 ). The deadline has passed, and Plaintiffs have failed to respond to the Show Cause Order. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action as moot. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 17 ) is likewise DENIED as moot. Final judgment consistent with this Entry will issue under separate order. See Order. Signed by District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/11/2026. (KAA) (Entered: 02/11/2026)","entry_number":"23"}],"30460":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69654288/23/hang-qiu-v-scott/","date":"2026-03-31","role":"ending","text":"ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS - Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is hereby  GRANTED. Dkt.  11 . This matter shall be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter  jurisdiction. Final judgment shall issue accordingly. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/31/2026.   (JSR)","entry_number":"23"}]}}