<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/</id>
  <title>The $100,000 H-1B payment · Passim litigation</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/"/>
  <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>Passim</name></author>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-10-28-056c6846b4</id>
    <title>Global Nurse Force v. Trump: Court denied government’s request to stay district proceedings</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71541425/feed/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Text-only ECF 144, filed October 28, records denial of the motion to stay proceedings, ECF 133. It concerns continued district litigation and does not stay the preliminary relief. Its conference and deadline text is internally inconsistent; no new scheduling date is established here.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-10-09-cd11459693</id>
    <title>Global Nurse Force v. Trump: Ninth Circuit assigned appeal number and preliminary-injunction briefing schedule</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.457426/gov.uscourts.cand.457426.138.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The court assigned appeal 26-6667 from district case 4:25-cv-08454-HSG. Its October 9 time-schedule notice sets the opening brief for November 6, 2026, the answering brief for December 4, and an optional reply within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The notice does not grant a stay.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-10-09-c509794f09</id>
    <title>Global Nurse Force v. Trump: Government requested stay of district proceedings</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.457426/gov.uscourts.cand.457426.133.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Defendants requested a stay of further district proceedings or alternative 30-day extensions. Their motion states that the existing vacatur would remain in place during the requested stay; this filing does not establish a court ruling.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-10-09-384add7603</id>
    <title>Global Nurse Force v. Trump: Government appealed H-1B fee preliminary-relief order</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.457426/gov.uscourts.cand.457426.132.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Defendants filed notice of an appeal to the Ninth Circuit from the September 30 order granting preliminary relief in part. The notice does not itself stay that order.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/#status-2026-09-30-blocked</id>
    <title>The $100,000 H-1B payment: Payment implementation set aside</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/"/>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>N.D. Cal. vacated and enjoined the agency policies under both proclamations</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-09-30-13359dd01e</id>
    <title>Global Nurse Force v. Trump: Court granted partial preliminary relief against H-1B fee implementation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.457426/gov.uscourts.cand.457426.130.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The court vacated and remanded the agency policies implementing the $100,000 H-1B payment requirement and enjoined their implementation pending APA notice and comment and RFA analyses. It denied provisional class certification without prejudice and did not enjoin the presidential proclamations.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/#status-2026-07-24-blocked</id>
    <title>The $100,000 H-1B payment: Set aside by a federal court</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The First Circuit denied a stay pending appeal</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-25-cv-13829-26-1699-state-of-california-v-mullin/#2026-07-24-7ae01fa3bb</id>
    <title>State of California v. Mullin: First Circuit denied stay of H-1B fee vacatur</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1/files/opnfiles/26-1699O-01A.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-07-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The First Circuit denied the government's motion to stay the district court order and final judgment vacating the $100,000 H-1B fee policy pending appeal.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/#status-2026-06-12-in_effect</id>
    <title>The $100,000 H-1B payment: Vacatur temporarily stayed</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/"/>
    <updated>2026-06-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>D. Mass. administratively stayed its judgment pending the First Circuit's stay ruling (Doc. 113); the June 12 date is from the docket entry</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-25-cv-13829-26-1699-state-of-california-v-mullin/#2026-06-12-fd2095a405</id>
    <title>State of California v. Mullin: Defendants moved to stay the vacatur pending appeal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.293201/gov.uscourts.mad.293201.111.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-06-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Defendants moved for a stay pending appeal, arguing that the June 8 order should be stayed while First Circuit review proceeds.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-25-cv-13829-26-1699-state-of-california-v-mullin/#2026-06-11-039ae38f22</id>
    <title>State of California v. Mullin: Defendants appealed to the First Circuit</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.293201/gov.uscourts.mad.293201.108.0_1.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-06-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Defendants filed a notice of appeal from the June 8 final judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/#status-2026-06-08-blocked</id>
    <title>The $100,000 H-1B payment: Set aside by a federal court</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/"/>
    <updated>2026-06-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>D. Mass. vacated the agency policies imposing the payment (Docs. 106, 107)</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-25-cv-13829-26-1699-state-of-california-v-mullin/#2026-06-08-8f80934e2e</id>
    <title>State of California v. Mullin: District court vacated H-1B fee policy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.293201/gov.uscourts.mad.293201.106.0_1.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-06-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The District of Massachusetts granted summary judgment to the plaintiff states, denied defendants' summary-judgment motion, and vacated the USCIS policy implementing the $100,000 H-1B fee.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-25-cv-03675-25-5473-chamber-of-commerce-of-the-united-states-of-america-v-u-s-department-of-homeland-security/#2025-12-29-21167e940f</id>
    <title>Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security: Plaintiffs appealed to the D.C. Circuit</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.285953/gov.uscourts.dcd.285953.55.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2025-12-29T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Chamber and AAU noticed an appeal from ECF 53 and 54 (ECF 55); the appeal is D.C. Circuit No. 25-5473.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/#status-2025-12-23-in_effect</id>
    <title>The $100,000 H-1B payment: In effect; upheld by one court</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/"/>
    <updated>2025-12-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>D.D.C. granted the government summary judgment in Chamber of Commerce v. DHS</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-25-cv-03675-25-5473-chamber-of-commerce-of-the-united-states-of-america-v-u-s-department-of-homeland-security/#2025-12-23-cebf0f5681</id>
    <title>Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security: Court granted the government summary judgment and upheld the payment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.285953/gov.uscourts.dcd.285953.54.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2025-12-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 53 and 54 denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction or summary judgment and granted the government's cross-motion, holding that the Proclamation and its implementation are lawful and withstand the ultra vires and APA challenges.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-25-cv-13829-26-1699-state-of-california-v-mullin/#2025-12-12-79180eb37d</id>
    <title>State of California v. Mullin: States challenged $100,000 H-1B petition fee</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.293201/gov.uscourts.mad.293201.1.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2025-12-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Twenty plaintiff states filed a District of Massachusetts challenge to federal implementation of the presidential proclamation imposing a $100,000 H-1B payment requirement.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-25-cv-03675-25-5473-chamber-of-commerce-of-the-united-states-of-america-v-u-s-department-of-homeland-security/#2025-10-16-43498c43cb</id>
    <title>Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security: Chamber of Commerce and AAU sued over the $100,000 H-1B payment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71666384/chamber-of-commerce-of-the-united-states-of-america-v-united-states/#entry-1"/>
    <updated>2025-10-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The plaintiffs alleged that the Proclamation and its implementation by DHS and the State Department are ultra vires and violate the APA.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
