https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/courthouse-arrests/ICE civil arrests at immigration courts and state courthouses ยท Passim litigation2026-10-15T00:00:00ZPassimhttps://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cacd-2-26-cv-12026-state-of-california-v-u-s-immigration-and-customs-enforcement/#2026-10-15-3421ca9be2State of California v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement: California filed challenge to ICE courthouse arrests2026-10-15T00:00:00ZThe complaint alleges APA and Tenth Amendment violations and seeks declaratory relief, vacatur of the operative courthouse-enforcement directive, and injunctions, including against civil immigration arrests at California courts. These are requested remedies.https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-5-25-cv-06487-carmen-aracely-pablo-sequen-v-sergio-albarran/#2026-10-01-5b2bc14511Carmen Aracely Pablo Sequen v. Sergio Albarran: Plaintiffs moved to enforce the detention-conditions preliminary injunction2026-10-01T00:00:00ZECF 235 asks the court to find violations of the November 25, 2025 preliminary injunction at 630 Sansome Street and to order compliance plans and reporting; it is noticed for hearing on November 5, 2026. This is plaintiffs' request; the court hasn't ruled.https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-25-cv-06366-african-communities-together-and-the-door-v-david-j-venturella/#2026-09-30-f8d7326fc9African Communities Together and The Door v. David J. Venturella: Court directed limited vacatur of ICE immigration-courthouse guidance2026-09-30T00:00:00ZThe court found the 2025 ICE courthouse-arrest policy arbitrary and capricious and directed vacatur of the January and May 2025 guidance only to the extent it rescinds April 2021 guidance for civil enforcement in or near immigration courts. Other counts were resolved for defendants or dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-5-25-cv-06487-carmen-aracely-pablo-sequen-v-sergio-albarran/#2026-09-18-d7e3938db6Carmen Aracely Pablo Sequen v. Sergio Albarran: Ninth Circuit dismissed another earlier government appeal2026-09-18T00:00:00ZThe Ninth Circuit granted the government's motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal No. 25-8055; the order serves as the mandate.https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-5-25-cv-06487-carmen-aracely-pablo-sequen-v-sergio-albarran/#2026-07-24-6542b86132Carmen Aracely Pablo Sequen v. Sergio Albarran: Ninth Circuit dismissed two earlier government appeals2026-07-24T00:00:00ZThe Ninth Circuit granted the government's motions to voluntarily dismiss appeals No. 26-1045 (July 23, ECF 224) and No. 25-7868 (July 24, ECF 225). The orders serve as the mandate.https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-5-25-cv-06487-carmen-aracely-pablo-sequen-v-sergio-albarran/#2026-07-22-44e1a66411Carmen Aracely Pablo Sequen v. Sergio Albarran: Court set the schedule for the remaining claims2026-07-22T00:00:00ZThe case management order (ECF 221) sets a December 16, 2026 fact discovery cutoff, a March 12, 2027 dispositive-motion deadline and a July 30, 2027 trial setting conference.https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-5-25-cv-06487-carmen-aracely-pablo-sequen-v-sergio-albarran/#2026-07-10-38399f0f4dCarmen Aracely Pablo Sequen v. Sergio Albarran: Court denied a stay pending appeal2026-07-10T00:00:00ZECF 217 denied the government's motion to stay the June 30 judgment pending appeal, finding that the government had at most raised serious legal questions and had not shown a high degree of irreparable harm.https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-5-25-cv-06487-carmen-aracely-pablo-sequen-v-sergio-albarran/#2026-07-07-aa306a6c35Carmen Aracely Pablo Sequen v. Sergio Albarran: Ninth Circuit docketed the appeal as No. 26-43102026-07-07T00:00:00ZThe docketing notice and time schedule order (filed in the district court as ECF 215) set the opening brief for August 17 and the answering brief for September 15, 2026.https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-5-25-cv-06487-carmen-aracely-pablo-sequen-v-sergio-albarran/#2026-07-02-4de7fc1944Carmen Aracely Pablo Sequen v. Sergio Albarran: Government appealed the judgment to the Ninth Circuit2026-07-02T00:00:00ZDefendants filed a notice of appeal from the June 30 Rule 54(b) judgment (ECF 213) and the same day moved for a stay pending appeal (ECF 214). These are the government's filings.https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-5-25-cv-06487-carmen-aracely-pablo-sequen-v-sergio-albarran/#2026-06-30-997262369aCarmen Aracely Pablo Sequen v. Sergio Albarran: Court entered Rule 54(b) judgment on the APA claims2026-06-30T00:00:00ZOn the parties' stipulation, ECF 212 entered final judgment under Rule 54(b) on the June 23 order and denied as moot plaintiffs' motions to enforce that order.https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/courthouse-arrests/#status-2026-06-23-blockedICE civil arrests at immigration courts and state courthouses: 2025 courthouse-arrest policies set aside2026-06-23T00:00:00ZNorthern District of California vacated ICE Policy Nos. 11072.3 and 11072.4 and EOIR OPPM 25-06https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-5-25-cv-06487-carmen-aracely-pablo-sequen-v-sergio-albarran/#2026-06-23-aed0a1d893Carmen Aracely Pablo Sequen v. Sergio Albarran: Court vacated ICE and EOIR courthouse-arrest policies and the hold-room waiver2026-06-23T00:00:00ZECF 205 certified a courthouse-arrest class and a detention class, granted partial summary judgment on the APA claims, and vacated ICE Policy Nos. 11072.3 and 11072.4, EOIR OPPM 25-06 and ICE's June 24, 2025 Nationwide Hold Room Waiver under 5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A). The court declined to limit the vacatur to the certified classes.