<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/birthright-citizenship/</id>
  <title>Executive orders limiting birthright citizenship · Passim litigation</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/birthright-citizenship/"/>
  <updated>2026-10-26T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>Passim</name></author>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-10-26-c1332d44d6</id>
    <title>Nathan v. Trump: Plaintiffs replied and filed an amended complaint</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74859805/nathan-v-trump/#entry-35"/>
    <updated>2026-10-26T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 34 (reply in support of both motions) and ECF 35 (amended complaint).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-10-23-7b300e7c51</id>
    <title>Nathan v. Trump: Court set a November 12 hearing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74859805/nathan-v-trump/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A minute order directs the parties to appear on November 12, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. for a hearing on the classwide preliminary-injunction and class-certification motions.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-10-21-9492b80879</id>
    <title>Nathan v. Trump: Government opposed both motions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74859805/nathan-v-trump/#entry-24"/>
    <updated>2026-10-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 24 (preliminary injunction) and ECF 25 (class certification).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-10-09-bd9a597827</id>
    <title>Nathan v. Trump: Plaintiffs moved for a classwide preliminary injunction and class certification</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74859805/nathan-v-trump/#entry-12"/>
    <updated>2026-10-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 12 and 13. These are the plaintiffs' requests; the court hasn't ruled.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-09-28-75b28ad857</id>
    <title>Nathan v. Trump: Plaintiffs filed a proposed class action against Executive Order 14418</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.297026/gov.uscourts.dcd.297026.1.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The complaint challenges the 2026 order under the Citizenship Clause and 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a) and seeks vacatur of DHS's interim final rule on children of foreign government employees.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-25-365-barbara-v-trump/#2026-09-09-1f1274f1b4</id>
    <title>Barbara v. Trump: Plaintiffs announced new motions seeking protection for an additional class</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nhd.65710/gov.uscourts.nhd.65710.92.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Counsel announced new motions asking the district court to certify a new class affected by the August executive order. This is a request for relief, not a new court ruling.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mdd-8-25-cv-00201-casa-inc-v-trump/#2026-09-08-de8cfa59c7</id>
    <title>CASA, Inc. v. Trump: Government moved to dissolve or stay the injunction</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.574698/gov.uscourts.mdd.574698.183.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 183 asks the court to dissolve the September 2 injunction or stay it pending appeal. This is the government's request; the court hasn't ruled.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/birthright-citizenship/#status-2026-09-02-partly_blocked</id>
    <title>Executive orders limiting birthright citizenship: 2025 order blocked; 2026 order blocked for a class</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/birthright-citizenship/"/>
    <updated>2026-09-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>D. Md. enjoined Executive Order 14418 as to the certified class in CASA v. Trump</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mdd-8-25-cv-00201-casa-inc-v-trump/#2026-09-02-800a3b2a24</id>
    <title>CASA, Inc. v. Trump: Court enjoined Executive Order 14418 as to the certified class</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.574698/gov.uscourts.mdd.574698.182.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 181 and 182 barred the defendants from enforcing or applying the 2026 order against class members, except section 2(d), and left the August 7, 2025 injunction in effect.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mdd-8-25-cv-00201-casa-inc-v-trump/#2026-08-28-aa6e8fb851</id>
    <title>CASA, Inc. v. Trump: Court denied a TRO without prejudice and allowed a supplemental complaint</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69563661/casa-inc-v-trump/#entry-176"/>
    <updated>2026-08-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 176 denied without prejudice the plaintiffs' motion for additional classwide relief against Executive Order 14418 (ECF 168) and granted leave to supplement the amended complaint.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mdd-8-25-cv-00201-casa-inc-v-trump/#2026-08-14-dd323fff7c</id>
    <title>CASA, Inc. v. Trump: Fourth Circuit dismissed the government's appeal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.574698/gov.uscourts.mdd.574698.163.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Fourth Circuit granted the government's unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal No. 25-2188 under Rule 42(b) and issued its mandate.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-25-365-barbara-v-trump/#2026-08-11-8b0d84850d</id>
    <title>Barbara v. Trump: Plaintiffs sought clarification after second birthright-citizenship order</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nhd.65710/gov.uscourts.nhd.65710.80.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-08-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Plaintiffs asked the District of New Hampshire to clarify, modify, or issue a new preliminary injunction after the President signed a second birthright-citizenship order.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/birthright-citizenship/#status-2026-08-06-partly_blocked</id>
    <title>Executive orders limiting birthright citizenship: New order issued; no order-specific injunction yet</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/birthright-citizenship/"/>
    <updated>2026-08-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The President issued Executive Order 14418</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/birthright-citizenship/#status-2026-06-30-blocked</id>
    <title>Executive orders limiting birthright citizenship: Blocked for a nationwide class</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/birthright-citizenship/"/>
    <updated>2026-06-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Trump v. Barbara affirmed the class injunction against Executive Order 14160</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-25-365-barbara-v-trump/#2026-06-30-37a97eadb6</id>
    <title>Barbara v. Trump: Supreme Court affirmed birthright-citizenship protection</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-365_4hdj.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-06-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Court held that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment and affirmed the judgment below.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mdd-8-25-cv-00201-casa-inc-v-trump/#2025-08-07-0546383939</id>
    <title>CASA, Inc. v. Trump: Court certified a nationwide class and enjoined Executive Order 14160 as to the class</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.574698/gov.uscourts.mdd.574698.130.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2025-08-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 130 certified a Rule 23(b)(2) class of children born or to be born in the United States after February 19, 2025 to a mother unlawfully or temporarily present and a father who was not a citizen or permanent resident. ECF 132 granted a classwide preliminary injunction and vacated the February 5, 2025 injunction on joint motion.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mdd-8-25-cv-00201-casa-inc-v-trump/#2025-06-27-e507718393</id>
    <title>CASA, Inc. v. Trump: Supreme Court partially stayed the universal injunctions in Trump v. CASA</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf"/>
    <updated>2025-06-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Court granted partial stays of this and two other injunctions "to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue."</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mdd-8-25-cv-00201-casa-inc-v-trump/#2025-02-05-3ff1dd2ac5</id>
    <title>CASA, Inc. v. Trump: Court preliminarily enjoined Executive Order 14160</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/sites/mdd/files/25-201.pdf"/>
    <updated>2025-02-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 65 and 66 granted a preliminary injunction against implementation and enforcement of the 2025 order. The Supreme Court later described it as a universal injunction.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
