<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/</id>
  <title>Passim litigation</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/"/>
  <updated>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>Passim</name></author>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-05724-national-tps-alliance-v-noem/#2026-10-30-e9bbfc4080</id>
    <title>National TPS Alliance v. Noem: Ninth Circuit denied stay pending appeal and alternative administrative stay</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2026/10/30/25-5724.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>After the Supreme Court remand, the panel denied the government’s stay motion and alternative request for an administrative stay of at least 21 days. The order says the Supreme Court’s current stay expires with its mandate on November 6 and provides for a separate expedited merits schedule.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-26-cv-11201-african-communities-together-v-noem/#2026-10-28-50a3690c09</id>
    <title>African Communities Together v. Noem: Coalition brief supports plaintiffs’ Somalia TPS appeal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2026/docs/1930_African-Communities_AmicusBr.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The brief identifies First Circuit 26-1930 as plaintiffs’ appeal from D. Mass. 1:26-cv-11201 and urges reversal of the denial of emergency relief. It is dated October 26; its certificate states electronic filing and service on October 28. The brief does not grant relief.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-10-28-056c6846b4</id>
    <title>Global Nurse Force v. Trump: Court denied government’s request to stay district proceedings</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71541425/feed/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Text-only ECF 144, filed October 28, records denial of the motion to stay proceedings, ECF 133. It concerns continued district litigation and does not stay the preliminary relief. Its conference and deadline text is internally inconsistent; no new scheduling date is established here.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-6842-rodriguez-vazquez-v-bostock/#2026-10-28-b67953d2cb</id>
    <title>Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock: Government petitioned for Supreme Court review of mandatory-detention class judgment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/26/26-568/431052/20261028164704135_Rodriguez_Vazquez_Final.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The government asks the Court to hold the petition pending Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha, No. 26-104. The official docket sets a November 30 response deadline; review has not been granted.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca2-25-3141-cunha-v-freden/#2026-10-28-b46bcd8a1c</id>
    <title>Cunha v. Freden: Supreme Court extended mandatory-detention merits briefing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26-104.html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Court granted an extension: the joint appendix and petitioner’s merits brief are due November 30, 2026, and the respondent’s merits brief is due January 13, 2027. This scheduling order does not decide the detention question.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-10-26-c1332d44d6</id>
    <title>Nathan v. Trump: Plaintiffs replied and filed an amended complaint</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74859805/nathan-v-trump/#entry-35"/>
    <updated>2026-10-26T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 34 (reply in support of both motions) and ECF 35 (amended complaint).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-25-cv-10676-d-v-d-v-u-s-department-of-homeland-security/#2026-10-23-dae443e919</id>
    <title>D.V.D. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security: Government submitted opening merits brief and joint appendix</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26-426.html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Supreme Court docket records submission of the government’s opening merits brief and joint appendix. The brief challenges jurisdiction, classwide relief, and the ruling against the third-country-removal guidance; it is not a Court decision.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-10-23-7b300e7c51</id>
    <title>Nathan v. Trump: Court set a November 12 hearing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74859805/nathan-v-trump/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A minute order directs the parties to appear on November 12, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. for a hearing on the classwide preliminary-injunction and class-certification motions.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca5-26-50183-26-50219-26-50221-ignacio-sosnava-rodriguez-v-sylvester-ortega-alejandro-villegas-angel-v-markwayne-mullin-miguel-angel-gomez-alvarado-v-miguel-vergara/#2026-10-23-427d05b1b5</id>
    <title>Ignacio Sosnava Rodriguez v. Sylvester Ortega / Alejandro Villegas Angel v. Markwayne Mullin / Miguel Angel Gomez Alvarado v. Miguel Vergara: En banc Fifth Circuit reversed judgments and vacated habeas relief</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/26/26-50183-CV1.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The court rejected the three petitioners’ due-process claims concerning bond hearings and detention duration under section 1225(b)(2)(A), reversed the judgments, vacated habeas relief, and directed the mandate to issue immediately.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-10-21-9492b80879</id>
    <title>Nathan v. Trump: Government opposed both motions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74859805/nathan-v-trump/#entry-24"/>
    <updated>2026-10-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 24 (preliminary injunction) and ECF 25 (class certification).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-05724-national-tps-alliance-v-noem/#2026-10-21-febbe51455</id>
    <title>National TPS Alliance v. Noem: Plaintiffs filed second amended complaint under the limited amendment order</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.444868/gov.uscourts.cand.444868.496.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The ECF 496 filing notice confirms that the second amended complaint drops the two Haiti termination APA claims and excludes the three rejected new claims. It states that the APA claims on appeal are unchanged and combines the existing equal-protection claims as Claim 4. This is a pleading update, not a new grant of relief.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-26-cv-02103-1-26-cv-02280-noor-doe-v-noem-abdo-doe-v-noem/#2026-10-20-990938889e</id>
    <title>Noor Doe v. Noem / Abdo Doe v. Noem: Court held certification and discovery-stay requests in abeyance</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.659704/gov.uscourts.nysd.659704.75.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-20T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The endorsed order holds the government’s interlocutory-appeal and discovery-stay requests in abeyance and directs an October 30 joint letter proposing how litigation should proceed, including any summary-judgment schedule and briefing of record or discovery disputes.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca1-25-2152-26-1094-guerrero-orellana-v-moniz/#2026-10-20-242e7749af</id>
    <title>Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz: Government sought reconsideration of transfer-notice requirement</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.289225/gov.uscourts.mad.289225.214.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-20T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 214 asks under Rules 59(e) and 60(b) for reconsideration of the September 22 order’s transfer-notice requirement. Plaintiffs oppose the request; this motion does not establish that the court granted relief.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-26-49-brenna-bird-v-iowa-migrant-movement-for-justice/#2026-10-19-1aaae3ec31</id>
    <title>Brenna Bird v. Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice: Supreme Court requested Solicitor General's views on Iowa petition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/101926zor_q8l1.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-19T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in No. 26-49. The order does not grant certiorari or change the injunction against Iowa's law.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cacd-2-26-cv-12026-state-of-california-v-u-s-immigration-and-customs-enforcement/#2026-10-15-3421ca9be2</id>
    <title>State of California v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement: California filed challenge to ICE courthouse arrests</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/complaintcaliforniavice.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The complaint alleges APA and Tenth Amendment violations and seeks declaratory relief, vacatur of the operative courthouse-enforcement directive, and injunctions, including against civil immigration arrests at California courts. These are requested remedies.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-05724-national-tps-alliance-v-noem/#2026-10-15-698b8919a0</id>
    <title>National TPS Alliance v. Noem: TPS holders opposed government’s motion for a stay pending appeal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://law.ucla.edu/sites/default/files/PDFs/Center_for_Immigration_Law_and_Policy/NTPSA_I_Plaintiffs'_Opposition_to_Stay.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>In DktEntry 90.1, plaintiffs argued that prior circuit precedent on TPS vacatur authority survives Mullin v. Doe, disputed mootness, and opposed a stay on equitable grounds. This is a filed opposition, not a ruling on the stay or restoration of TPS.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-05724-national-tps-alliance-v-noem/#2026-10-14-b6ac4cbea0</id>
    <title>National TPS Alliance v. Noem: District court permitted removal of barred claims but rejected three new constitutional claims</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.444868/gov.uscourts.cand.444868.487.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 487 allows plaintiffs to eliminate the APA challenges to the July and November 2025 Haiti TPS terminations but denies leave to add proposed due-process, bare-animus equal-protection, and ultra vires claims as futile. It sets a November 17 status conference and does not restore TPS.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-26-49-brenna-bird-v-iowa-migrant-movement-for-justice/#2026-10-13-d3a46af820</id>
    <title>Brenna Bird v. Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice: Supreme Court distributed Iowa petition for October 16 conference</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26-49.html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The official docket records distribution for the October 16, 2026 conference after October 8 rescheduling. This is a scheduling entry, not a grant or denial of certiorari.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca11-25-14065-25-14075-fidencio-hernandez-alvarez-v-warden-federal-detention-center-miami-ismael-cerro-perez-v-assistant-field-office-director/#2026-10-13-c57917c04d</id>
    <title>Fidencio Hernandez Alvarez v. Warden, Federal Detention Center Miami / Ismael Cerro Perez v. Assistant Field Office Director: Eleventh Circuit placed the en banc rehearing petition in abeyance pending Supreme Court review</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71937359/fidencio-alvarez-v-warden-federal-detention-center-miami/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The court ordered that the petition for rehearing en banc is held in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision in Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha, No. 26-104.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca5-26-10925-abasse-gakou-v-warden-of-the-prairieland-detention-center/#2026-10-10-d4bf99a89a</id>
    <title>Abasse Gakou v. Warden of the Prairieland Detention Center: Fifth Circuit denied administrative and pending-appeal removal stays</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/26/26-10925-CV0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>In a published order, the panel denied both stays sought to prevent removal to Sierra Leone. It concluded that section 1252(g) barred entertaining the stay motion and that Gakou had not demonstrated a meaningful probability of success, without considering the other three stay factors.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-10-09-bd9a597827</id>
    <title>Nathan v. Trump: Plaintiffs moved for a classwide preliminary injunction and class certification</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74859805/nathan-v-trump/#entry-12"/>
    <updated>2026-10-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 12 and 13. These are the plaintiffs' requests; the court hasn't ruled.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-10-09-cd11459693</id>
    <title>Global Nurse Force v. Trump: Ninth Circuit assigned appeal number and preliminary-injunction briefing schedule</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.457426/gov.uscourts.cand.457426.138.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The court assigned appeal 26-6667 from district case 4:25-cv-08454-HSG. Its October 9 time-schedule notice sets the opening brief for November 6, 2026, the answering brief for December 4, and an optional reply within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The notice does not grant a stay.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-10-09-c509794f09</id>
    <title>Global Nurse Force v. Trump: Government requested stay of district proceedings</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.457426/gov.uscourts.cand.457426.133.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Defendants requested a stay of further district proceedings or alternative 30-day extensions. Their motion states that the existing vacatur would remain in place during the requested stay; this filing does not establish a court ruling.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-10-09-384add7603</id>
    <title>Global Nurse Force v. Trump: Government appealed H-1B fee preliminary-relief order</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.457426/gov.uscourts.cand.457426.132.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Defendants filed notice of an appeal to the Ninth Circuit from the September 30 order granting preliminary relief in part. The notice does not itself stay that order.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-26-49-brenna-bird-v-iowa-migrant-movement-for-justice/#2026-10-08-ba3ee8a327</id>
    <title>Brenna Bird v. Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice: Supreme Court rescheduled Iowa state-enforcement petition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26-49.html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Supreme Court docket marks the petition rescheduled after its October 5 distribution for the October 9 conference. It does not list a replacement conference date or grant or deny review.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cadc-25-5243-refugee-and-immigrant-center-for-education-and-legal-services-v-noem/#2026-10-07-a20b51b76c</id>
    <title>Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services v. Noem: Petition distributed for November 6 conference</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26-239.html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Supreme Court docket records distribution for the November 6, 2026 conference. This scheduling entry does not grant or deny certiorari.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-26-cv-02103-1-26-cv-02280-noor-doe-v-noem-abdo-doe-v-noem/#2026-10-06-d9a9d00b27</id>
    <title>Noor Doe v. Noem / Abdo Doe v. Noem: Court dismissed most Yemen TPS claims and denied renewed preliminary injunction</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.659704/gov.uscourts.nysd.659704.71.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The opinion and order, Noor ECF 71 / Abdo ECF 114, dismisses all claims except intentional discrimination, with prejudice as to the dismissed claims; denies Abdo plaintiffs’ second preliminary-injunction motion; and lifts the litigation stays. It does not restore the vacated TPS postponement or decide the surviving discrimination claims.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cadc-25-5243-refugee-and-immigrant-center-for-education-and-legal-services-v-noem/#2026-10-06-e2bbc76408</id>
    <title>Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services v. Noem: Government filed certiorari reply and suggested alternative D.V.D. hold</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/26/26-239/428674/20261006160540990_26-239_Mullin_v_RAICES_cert_reply_final.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The government urged Supreme Court review and reversal of the D.C. Circuit asylum-access ruling. Alternatively, it suggested holding the petition pending DHS v. D.V.D., No. 26-426, and then granting review. These are party requests, not a Court ruling.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca1-25-2152-26-1094-guerrero-orellana-v-moniz/#2026-10-06-4c74cb3d7e</id>
    <title>Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz: First Circuit mandate recorded in district court</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71384338/feed/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>District ECF 213 records the First Circuit mandate concerning the two appeals; the docket entry was entered October 7. This does not terminate the district implementation proceedings.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-26-49-brenna-bird-v-iowa-migrant-movement-for-justice/#2026-10-05-b2eb91935d</id>
    <title>Brenna Bird v. Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice: Supreme Court distributed Iowa petition for October 9 conference</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26-49.html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The official docket records distribution for the October 9, 2026 conference following September 28 rescheduling; the petition remains pending.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca9-25-05724-national-tps-alliance-v-noem/#2026-10-05-5e11df3310</id>
    <title>National TPS Alliance v. Noem: Supreme Court vacated TPS judgment and remanded</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/100526zor_2a34.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Court granted the petition in No. 26-48, vacated the Ninth Circuit judgment, and remanded for further consideration in light of Mullin v. Doe, 609 U.S. 324 (2026).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/detention-without-bond/#status-2026-10-01-varies_by_circuit</id>
    <title>No-bond detention for people who entered without inspection: Split by circuit</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/detention-without-bond/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Supreme Court granted certiorari in No. 26-104</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-5-25-cv-06487-carmen-aracely-pablo-sequen-v-sergio-albarran/#2026-10-01-5b2bc14511</id>
    <title>Carmen Aracely Pablo Sequen v. Sergio Albarran: Plaintiffs moved to enforce the detention-conditions preliminary injunction</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.453807/gov.uscourts.cand.453807.235.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 235 asks the court to find violations of the November 25, 2025 preliminary injunction at 630 Sansome Street and to order compliance plans and reporting; it is noticed for hearing on November 5, 2026. This is plaintiffs' request; the court hasn't ruled.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca2-25-3141-cunha-v-freden/#2026-10-01-67bab927c6</id>
    <title>Cunha v. Freden: Supreme Court granted review of mandatory-detention split</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/100126zr_6j37.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-10-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Court granted certiorari in Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha to review the section 1225(b)(2)(A) mandatory-detention question; the grant does not resolve the merits.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/#status-2026-09-30-blocked</id>
    <title>The $100,000 H-1B payment: Payment implementation set aside</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/h1b-fee/"/>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>N.D. Cal. vacated and enjoined the agency policies under both proclamations</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/nysd-1-25-cv-06366-african-communities-together-and-the-door-v-david-j-venturella/#2026-09-30-f8d7326fc9</id>
    <title>African Communities Together and The Door v. David J. Venturella: Court directed limited vacatur of ICE immigration-courthouse guidance</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.646893/gov.uscourts.nysd.646893.110.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The court found the 2025 ICE courthouse-arrest policy arbitrary and capricious and directed vacatur of the January and May 2025 guidance only to the extent it rescinds April 2021 guidance for civil enforcement in or near immigration courts. Other counts were resolved for defendants or dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-4-25-cv-08454-global-nurse-force-v-trump/#2026-09-30-13359dd01e</id>
    <title>Global Nurse Force v. Trump: Court granted partial preliminary relief against H-1B fee implementation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.457426/gov.uscourts.cand.457426.130.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The court vacated and remanded the agency policies implementing the $100,000 H-1B payment requirement and enjoined their implementation pending APA notice and comment and RFA analyses. It denied provisional class certification without prejudice and did not enjoin the presidential proclamations.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/third-country-removals/#status-2026-09-29-in_effect</id>
    <title>Removals to third countries not named in removal orders: In effect; Supreme Court review pending</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://passimai.com/litigation/issues/third-country-removals/"/>
    <updated>2026-09-29T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>After the First Circuit largely affirmed, the Supreme Court stayed the judgment and granted certiorari (No. 26-426).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-25-cv-10676-d-v-d-v-u-s-department-of-homeland-security/#2026-09-29-b2de5d0d09</id>
    <title>D.V.D. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security: Supreme Court stayed D.V.D. judgment and granted review</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/092926zr2_1a7d.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-29T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Supreme Court stayed the District of Massachusetts's February 25, 2026 order and judgment in No. 1:25-cv-10676, treated application No. 26A406 as a certiorari petition, and granted review in No. 26-426. The stay lasts until the Court sends down its judgment; briefing is to allow argument in the December 2026 session.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-26-49-brenna-bird-v-iowa-migrant-movement-for-justice/#2026-09-28-3091009bd9</id>
    <title>Brenna Bird v. Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice: Supreme Court rescheduled Iowa petition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26-49.html"/>
    <updated>2026-09-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The official docket records the petition as rescheduled after its earlier conference distribution; it does not record a grant or denial.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-25-cv-10676-d-v-d-v-u-s-department-of-homeland-security/#2026-09-28-b2ac8e5394</id>
    <title>D.V.D. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security: D.V.D. respondents opposed Supreme Court stay request</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26a406.html"/>
    <updated>2026-09-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Supreme Court docket records that D.V.D. respondents filed their opposition to DHS's stay application; two amicus briefs were also submitted.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/dcd-1-26-cv-03377-nathan-v-trump/#2026-09-28-75b28ad857</id>
    <title>Nathan v. Trump: Plaintiffs filed a proposed class action against Executive Order 14418</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.297026/gov.uscourts.dcd.297026.1.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The complaint challenges the 2026 order under the Citizenship Clause and 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a) and seeks vacatur of DHS's interim final rule on children of foreign government employees.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca2-25-3141-cunha-v-freden/#2026-09-25-e0c1c5694c</id>
    <title>Cunha v. Freden: Second Circuit denied rehearing en banc in mandatory-detention case</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/OPN/25-3141_complete%20en%20banc_opn.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-25T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>After a judge-requested poll, the Second Circuit denied rehearing en banc of the April 28 panel decision, over a dissent by Judge Menashi joined in part by Judge Park.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-25-cv-10676-d-v-d-v-u-s-department-of-homeland-security/#2026-09-24-f0b153241e</id>
    <title>D.V.D. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security: DHS sought Supreme Court stay after First Circuit ruling</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26a406.html"/>
    <updated>2026-09-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>DHS filed a Supreme Court stay application in No. 26A406 from the First Circuit third-country-removal decision; Justice Jackson requested a response by 4 p.m. EDT on September 28, 2026.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cadc-25-5243-refugee-and-immigrant-center-for-education-and-legal-services-v-noem/#2026-09-23-a429e478bc</id>
    <title>Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services v. Noem: Respondents opposed Supreme Court review of asylum-shutdown ruling</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26-239.html"/>
    <updated>2026-09-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Supreme Court docket records the RAICES respondents' brief in opposition. The same day, Iowa and 21 other states, the Federation for American Immigration Reform, America First Legal Foundation, and America's Future et al. filed or submitted amicus briefs supporting the government's petition.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca1-25-2152-26-1094-guerrero-orellana-v-moniz/#2026-09-22-ab0f34cee1</id>
    <title>Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz: Court required 72-hour notice of specified transfers and revised class notices</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.289225/gov.uscourts.mad.289225.212.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-22T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>ECF 212 requires at least 72 hours’ advance notice to the class member, the member’s attorney if known, and class counsel before transfer outside the First Circuit of a class member who requests a bond hearing. It adopts the Third Notice and supersedes the January 29 notice obligations.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/mad-1-25-cv-10676-d-v-d-v-u-s-department-of-homeland-security/#2026-09-18-81094dc7b6</id>
    <title>D.V.D. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security: First Circuit largely affirmed third-country-removal notice ruling</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1/files/opnfiles/26-1212P-01A.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The First Circuit vacated the sequencing declarations for lack of standing but otherwise affirmed the judgment requiring effective notice and a meaningful opportunity to raise fear-based claims before third-country removal.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/cand-5-25-cv-06487-carmen-aracely-pablo-sequen-v-sergio-albarran/#2026-09-18-d7e3938db6</id>
    <title>Carmen Aracely Pablo Sequen v. Sergio Albarran: Ninth Circuit dismissed another earlier government appeal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.453807/gov.uscourts.cand.453807.230.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The Ninth Circuit granted the government's motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal No. 25-8055; the order serves as the mandate.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/ca1-25-2152-26-1094-guerrero-orellana-v-moniz/#2026-09-15-9d155be6b1</id>
    <title>Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz: Court stayed constitutional counts and dismissed separate APA vacatur claim</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71384338/feed/"/>
    <updated>2026-09-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Electronic order ECF 206 denies dismissal of Counts II–IV without prejudice to renewal if the controlling statutory holding is displaced, stays those counts, dismisses Count V seeking APA vacatur of Matter of Yajure Hurtado, and denies partial summary judgment and class certification on Count V. The existing statutory class judgment is not vacated.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://passimai.com/litigation/cases/scotus-25a952-dahlia-doe-v-noem/#2026-09-11-53612fa1d1</id>
    <title>Dahlia Doe v. Noem: Government sought dismissal or summary judgment on remand</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.651493/gov.uscourts.nysd.651493.95.0.pdf"/>
    <updated>2026-09-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The government submitted a memorandum supporting its cross-motion to dismiss or alternatively for summary judgment and opposing plaintiffs' partial-summary-judgment motion; this is requested relief, not a court ruling.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
